Trial reportBlood2021
Factors associated with outcomes after a second CD19-targeted CAR T-cell infusion for refractory B-cell malignancies.
Trial report in Blood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I/II Study of Immunotherapy for Advanced CD19+ Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Defined Subsets of Autologous T Cells Engineered to Express a CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor
A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of B4T2-001 CAR-T in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harmonisation of quality control tests for academic production of CAR-T cells: a position paper from the WP-bioproduction of the UNITC consortium.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Guideline
- Pooled it
- Role of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Second-Line Large B Cell Lymphoma: Lessons from Phase 3 Trials. An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2022Guideline
- Histone marks identify novel transcription factors that parse CAR-T subset-of-origin, clinical potential and expansion.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Factors associated with long-term outcomes of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory CLL.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Single-Cell RNA Analysis Reveals Cell-Intrinsic Functions of CAR T Cells Correlating with Response in a Phase II Study of Lymphoma Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Trial
- CAR-T-centered sequential therapy: current status, challenges, and future clinical perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Multi-dimensional orchestration of binders for improved CAR-T immunotherapy.Cancer letters · 2026Review
- Review
- T cell senescence and exhaustion: molecular mechanisms and immune rejuvenation for cancer immunotherapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Clinical Pharmacology of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in B-cell Malignancies.Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- Response to Methodological Concerns Regarding Eligibility Criteria and Study Selection in a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- BATF3 regulates differentiation of CD8Life science alliance · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of CAR T cell therapy in children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- CD19/CD22 bivalent CAR T cells in children, adolescents and young adults with B-ALL: final phase 1 trial results.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- CD22-targeted immunotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progressing following CD19-targeted immunotherapy.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Directed evolution-based discovery of ligands for in vivo restimulation of chimeric antigen receptor T cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- CAR-T cell therapies are coming after glioblastoma: An overview of early phase clinical trials and future perspectives.iScience · 2026Review
- Selecting the best treatment approach and optimizing sequencing strategies in large B-cell lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Article
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered (CD19 CAR) T-cell therapy has shown significant efficacy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. Yet, CD19 CAR T cells fail to induce durable responses in most patients. Second infusions of CD19 CAR T cells (CART2) have been considered as a possible approach to improve outcomes. We analyzed data from 44 patients with R/R B-cell malignancies (acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], n = 14; chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], n = 9; non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], n = 21) who received CART2 on a phase 1/2 trial (NCT01865617) at our institution. Despite a CART2 dose increase in 82% of patients, we observed a low incidence of severe toxicity after CART2 (grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, 9%; grade ≥3 neurotoxicity, 11%). After CART2, complete response (CR) was achieved in 22% of CLL, 19% of NHL, and 21% of ALL patients. The median durations of response after CART2 in CLL, NHL, and ALL patients were 33, 6, and 4 months, respectively. Addition of fludarabine to cyclophosphamide-based lymphodepletion before the first CAR T-cell infusion (CART1) and an increase in the CART2 dose compared with CART1 were independently associated with higher overall response rates and longer progression-free survival after CART2. We observed durable CAR T-cell persistence after CART2 in patients who received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine (Cy-Flu) lymphodepletion before CART1 and a higher CART2 compared with CART1 cell dose. The identification of 2 modifiable pretreatment factors independently associated with better outcomes after CART2 suggests strategies to improve in vivo CAR T-cell kinetics and responses after repeat CAR T-cell infusions, and has implications for the design of trials of novel CAR T-cell products after failure of prior CAR T-cell immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.