ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2021
An ensemble mixed effects model of sleep loss and performance.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting high anger intensity using ecological momentary assessment and wearable-derived physiological data in a trauma-affected sample.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Bidirectional Predictors Between Neurobehavioural Measures During Total Sleep Deprivation and Baseline and Recovery Sleep Measures.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Examining individual learning patterns using generalised linear mixed models.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Analyzing sales of the Korean restaurant franchise during the COVID-19 pandemic with the mixed-effects model approach.PloS one · 2023Article
- Dynamic ensemble prediction of cognitive performance in spaceflight.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Fatigue risk management based on self-reported fatigue: Expanding a biomathematical model of fatigue-related performance deficits to also predict subjective sleepiness.Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep loss causes decrements in cognitive performance, which increases risks to those in safety-sensitive fields, including medicine and aviation. Mathematical models can be formulated to predict performance decrement in response to sleep loss, with the goal of identifying when an individual may be at highest risk for an accident. This work produces an Ensemble Mixed Effects Model that combines a traditional Linear Mixed Effects (LME) model with a semi-parametric, nonlinear model called Mixed Effects Random Forest (MERF). Using this model, we predict performance on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), a test of sustained attention, using biologically motivated features extracted from a dataset containing demographic, sleep, and cognitive test data from 44 healthy participants studied during inpatient sleep loss laboratory experiments. Our Ensemble Mixed Effects Model accurately predicts an individual's trend in PVT performance, and fits the data better than prior published models. The ensemble successfully combines MERF's high rate of peak identification with LME's conservative predictions. We investigate two questions relevant to this model's potential use in operational settings: the tradeoff between additional model features versus ease of collecting these features in real-world settings, and how recent a cognitive task must have been administered to produce strong predictions. This work addresses limitations of previous approaches by developing a predictive model that accounts for interindividual differences and utilizes a nonlinear, semi-parametric method called MERF. We methodologically address the modeling decisions required for this prediction problem, including the choice of cross-validation method. This work is novel in its use of data from a highly-controlled inpatient study protocol that uncouples the influence of the sleep-wake cycle from the endogenous circadian rhythm on the cognitive task being modeled. This uncoupling provides a clearer picture of the model's real-world predictive ability for situations in which people work at different circadian times (e.g., night- or shift-work).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.