Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966589›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020

Means restriction for the prevention of suicide on roads.

Chukwudi Okolie, Keith Hawton, Keith Lloyd, Sian F Price, Michael Dennis, Ann John

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Means restriction for the prevention of suicide on roads.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Means restriction for the prevention of suicide by jumping.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Etiopathogenic Mosaic of Suicidal Behaviour.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Self-harm in adolescence and risk of crash: a 13-year cohort study of novice drivers in New South Wales, Australia.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chukwudi OkolieSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Keith HawtonCentre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Keith LloydSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Sian F PricePublic Health Wales Observatory, Public Health Wales, Carmarthen, UK.
Michael DennisSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Ann JohnSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Swansea University · GBPublic Health Wales · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad traffic suicides are common. However, due to the difficulty in distinguishing between motor vehicle crash fatalities and actual suicides, no official figures exist for this method of suicide. Restricting access to means is an important universal or population-based approach to suicide prevention with clear evidence of its effectiveness. However, the evidence with respect to means restriction for the prevention of suicide on roads is not well established. We conducted a systematic review to assess the impact of restrictions on the availability of, or access to, means of suicide on roads.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to restrict the availability of, or access to, means of suicide on roads. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Transport Research International Documentation (TRID) Database from the date of database inception to March 2020. We conducted searches of the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished and ongoing studies. We applied no date, language, or publication status restrictions to these searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies were randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled intervention studies without randomisation, before-after studies, or studies using interrupted time series designs, which evaluated interventions to restrict the availability of, or access to, means of suicide on roads. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors screened abstracts and full-text publications against the inclusion criteria. Two review authors planned to independently extract data and assess risk of bias of included studies. However, we identified no studies eligible for inclusion. MAIN

resultsWe identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis systematic review highlights the paucity of research around road traffic suicides and the need for future robust studies that aim to investigate the effectiveness of interventions to prevent suicide on roads. Suicide ascertainment is a key issue; therefore, clear objective criteria are necessary in order to scale up and study this method more accurately. In the absence of any substantial evidence, we advocate for more awareness on road traffic suicides and its inclusion in future government suicide prevention policies. Further research exploring effective measures, particularly those that do not require driver compliance, are also needed.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionAccidents, TrafficHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32966589
PMCPMC10230852
OpenAlexW3088675812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.