Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966580›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2020

Patient Care Documentation in the Secondary School Setting: Unique Challenges and Needs.

Tricia M Kasamatsu, Sara L Nottingham, Lindsey E Eberman, Elizabeth R Neil, Cailee E Welch Bacon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tricia M KasamatsuCalifornia State University, Fullerton.
Sara L NottinghamUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Lindsey E EbermanIndiana State University, Terre Haute.
Elizabeth R NeilXavier University, Cincinnati, OH.
Cailee E Welch BaconA.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAthletic trainers (ATs) recognize patient care documentation as an important part of clinical practice. However, ATs using 1 electronic medical record (EMR) platform reported low accountability and lack of time as barriers to documentation. Whether ATs using paper, other EMRs, or a combined paper-electronic system exhibit similar behaviors or experience similar challenges is unclear.

objectiveTo explore ATs' documentation behaviors and perceived challenges while using various systems to document patient care in the secondary school setting.

designQualitative study.

settingIndividual telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsTwenty ATs (12 women, 8 men; age = 38 ± 14 years; clinical experience = 15 ± 13 years; from National Athletic Trainers' Association Districts 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) were recruited via purposeful and snowball-sampling techniques. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators conducted semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Following the consensual qualitative research tradition, 3 researchers independently coded transcripts in 4 rounds using a codebook to confirm codes, themes, and data saturation. Multiple researchers, member checking, and peer reviewing were the methods used to triangulate data and enhance trustworthiness.

resultsThe secondary school setting was central to 3 themes. The ATs identified challenges to documentation, including lack of time due to high patient volume and multiple providers or locations where care was provided. Oftentimes, these challenges affected their documentation behaviors, including the process of and criteria for whether to document or not, content documented, and location and timing of documentation. To enhance patient care documentation, ATs described the need for more professional development, including resources or specific guidelines and viewing how documentation has been used to improve clinical practice.

conclusionsChallenges particular to the secondary school setting affected ATs' documentation behaviors, regardless of the system used to document care. Targeted professional development is needed to promote best practices in patient care documentation.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAdultDocumentationFemaleHumansMalePatient CarePhysical Education and TrainingSchoolsSportsSurveys and Questionnairesbarriersclinical documentationhealth care administrationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32966580
PMCPMC7594609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.