Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966576›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Chromosome-Scale Genome Assemblies of Aphids Reveal Extensively Rearranged Autosomes and Long-Term Conservation of the X Chromosome.

Thomas C Mathers, Roland H M Wouters, Sam T Mugford, David Swarbreck, Cock van Oosterhout, Saskia A Hogenhout

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas C MathersDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Roland H M WoutersDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Sam T MugfordDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
David SwarbreckEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Cock van OosterhoutSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Saskia A HogenhoutDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
John Innes Centre · GBNorwich Research Park · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002108/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P012574/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009481/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01227X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome rearrangements are arguably the most dramatic type of mutations, often leading to rapid evolution and speciation. However, chromosome dynamics have only been studied at the sequence level in a small number of model systems. In insects, Diptera and Lepidoptera have conserved genome structure at the scale of whole chromosomes or chromosome arms. Whether this reflects the diversity of insect genome evolution is questionable given that many species exhibit rapid karyotype evolution. Here, we investigate chromosome evolution in aphids-an important group of hemipteran plant pests-using newly generated chromosome-scale genome assemblies of the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) and the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), and a previously published assembly of the corn-leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis). We find that aphid autosomes have undergone dramatic reorganization over the last 30 My, to the extent that chromosome homology cannot be determined between aphids from the tribes Macrosiphini (Myzus persicae and Acyrthosiphon pisum) and Aphidini (Rhopalosiphum maidis). In contrast, gene content of the aphid sex (X) chromosome remained unchanged despite rapid sequence evolution, low gene expression, and high transposable element load. To test whether rapid evolution of genome structure is a hallmark of Hemiptera, we compared our aphid assemblies with chromosome-scale assemblies of two blood-feeding Hemiptera (Rhodnius prolixus and Triatoma rubrofasciata). Despite being more diverged, the blood-feeding hemipterans have conserved synteny. The exceptional rate of structural evolution of aphid autosomes renders them an important emerging model system for studying the role of large-scale genome rearrangements in evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, InsectGenome, InsectX ChromosomeAnimalsAphidsDNA Transposable ElementsFemaleMaleSyntenyDNA Transposable ElementsAcyrthosiphon pisumHemipterainsect genome assemblykaryotype evolutionMyzus persicaesex chromosomesynteny

Identifiers

PMID32966576
PMCPMC7947777
OpenAlexW3087838915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.