ArticlePloS one2020
Exploring the potential of comparative de novo transcriptomics to classify Saccharomyces brewing yeasts.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obtaining new brewing yeasts using regional Chilean wine yeasts through an adaptive evolution program.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Systematic profiling of ale yeast protein dynamics across fermentation and repitching.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work the potential of comparative transcriptomics was explored of Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae and S. pastorianus for their discrimination. This way an alternative should be demonstrated to comparative genomics, which can be difficult as a result of their aneuoploid genomes composed of mosaics of the parental genomes. Strains were selected according to their application in beer brewing, i.e. top and bottom fermenting yeasts. Comparative transcriptomics was performed for four strains each of commercially available S. cerevisiae (top fermenting) and Saccharomyces pastorianus (bottom fermenting) brewing yeasts grown at two different temperatures to mid-exponential growth phase. A non-reference based approach was chosen in the form of alignment against a de novo assembled brewery-associated pan transcriptome to exclude bias introduced by manual selection of reference genomes. The result is an analysis workflow for self-contained comparative transcriptomics of Saccharomyces yeasts including, but not limited to, the analysis of core and accessory gene expression, functional analysis and metabolic classification. The functionality of this workflow is demonstrated along the principal differentiation of accessory transcriptomes of S. cerevisiae versus S. pastorianus strains. Hence, this work provides a concept enabling studies under different brewing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.