Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966296›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Prioritizing sequence variants in conserved non-coding elements in the chicken genome using chCADD.

Christian Groß, Chiara Bortoluzzi, Dick de Ridder, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Martien A M Groenen, Marcel Reinders, Mirte Bosse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian GroßBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-4259
Chiara BortoluzziAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-6635
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-4310
Hendrik-Jan MegensAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3619-7533
Martien A M GroenenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-4545
Marcel ReindersDelft Bioinformatics Lab, University of Technology Delft, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1148-1562
Mirte BosseAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2433-2483
Wageningen University & Research · NLDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of genomes for many species has advanced our understanding of the non-protein-coding fraction of the genome. Comparative genomics has proven itself to be an invaluable approach for the systematic, genome-wide identification of conserved non-protein-coding elements (CNEs). However, for many non-mammalian model species, including chicken, our capability to interpret the functional importance of variants overlapping CNEs has been limited by current genomic annotations, which rely on a single information type (e.g. conservation). We here studied CNEs in chicken using a combination of population genomics and comparative genomics. To investigate the functional importance of variants found in CNEs we develop a ch(icken) Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (chCADD) model, a variant effect prediction tool first introduced for humans and later on for mouse and pig. We show that 73 Mb of the chicken genome has been conserved across more than 280 million years of vertebrate evolution. The vast majority of the conserved elements are in non-protein-coding regions, which display SNP densities and allele frequency distributions characteristic of genomic regions constrained by purifying selection. By annotating SNPs with the chCADD score we are able to pinpoint specific subregions of the CNEs to be of higher functional importance, as supported by SNPs found in these subregions are associated with known disease genes in humans, mice, and rats. Taken together, our findings indicate that CNEs harbor variants of functional significance that should be object of further investigation along with protein-coding mutations. We therefore anticipate chCADD to be of great use to the scientific community and breeding companies in future functional studies in chicken.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsChickensConserved SequenceDNA, IntergenicEvolution, MolecularGene FrequencyGenetic VariationGenomeGenomicsIntronsMetagenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence AnalysisDNA, Intergenic

Identifiers

PMID32966296
PMCPMC7535126
OpenAlexW3088641872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.