Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966286›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparison of growth patterns in healthy dogs and dogs in abnormal body condition using growth standards.

Carina Salt, Penelope J Morris, Richard F Butterwick, Elizabeth M Lund, Tim J Cole, Alexander J German

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developmental programming in dogs.Biology of reproduction · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Energy Requirements for Growth in the Norfolk Terrier.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carina SaltWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Mars Petcare, Waltham on the Wolds, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Penelope J MorrisWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Mars Petcare, Waltham on the Wolds, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Richard F ButterwickWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Mars Petcare, Waltham on the Wolds, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth M LundBanfield Pet Hospital, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.
Tim J ColeGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-8200
Alexander J GermanInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, Cheshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-7988
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M012069/1Medical Research Council MR/R010692/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In dogs, optimal growth is critical for future health and wellbeing. Recently, a series of evidence-based growth standards, based on bodyweight, were developed for male and female dogs across 5 different size categories. The aim of the current study was to compare growth curves depicted by the standards with patterns of growth in dogs that were either healthy, had abnormal body condition, or had various diseases with the potential to affect growth. The data came from 2 research colonies in Europe (France and UK), and a large corporate network of primary care veterinary hospitals across the USA. Age and bodyweight data were used to model growth in healthy dogs, in dogs that became overweight or underweight by 3 years of age, and in dogs with diseases associated with altered growth. Centile line crossing during the growth phase was uncommon in healthy dogs, with <5% of dogs crossing >2 centile lines. In contrast, centile line crossing was more frequent in dogs with abnormal growth patterns or abnormal body condition. Dogs that developed obesity by 3 years grew faster than the growth standards predicted, and 68% crossed ≥2 centile lines in an upwards direction. Dogs with conditions associated with accelerated growth also grew faster than expected, and 54% crossed ≥2 centile lines. In contrast dogs that became underweight by 3 years gained weight slower than expected, and 49% crossed ≥2 centile lines in a downwards direction. These results suggest that the growth standards are useful for monitoring healthy growth in dogs. Prospective studies are now required to confirm these findings and to determine whether early intervention can prevent the development of diseases.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsBody Mass IndexBody WeightDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFranceMaleOverweightRisk FactorsThinnessUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32966286
PMCPMC7510995
OpenAlexW3088781921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.