Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966269›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2020

Healthy donor T cell responses to common cold coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.

Bezawit A Woldemeskel, Abena K Kwaa, Caroline C Garliss, Oliver Laeyendecker, Stuart C Ray, Joel N Blankson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Mouse models susceptible to HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63 and cross protection from challenge with SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bezawit A WoldemeskelDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abena K KwaaDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Caroline C GarlissDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Oliver LaeyendeckerDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stuart C RayDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joel N BlanksonDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
A mouse viral outgrowth assay for the detection of residual HIV-1 reservoirsR01AI120024 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BLANKSON, JOEL N · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDT cell responses to the common cold coronaviruses have not been well characterized. Preexisting T cell immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been reported, and a recent study suggested that this immunity was due to cross-recognition of the novel coronavirus by T cells specific for the common cold coronaviruses.METHODSWe used the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay to characterize the T cell responses against peptide pools derived from the spike protein of 3 common cold coronaviruses (HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-OC43) and SARS-CoV-2 in 21 healthy donors (HDs) who were seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 and had no known exposure to the virus. An in vitro expansion culture assay was also used to analyze memory T cell responses.RESULTSWe found responses to the spike protein of the 3 common cold coronaviruses in many of the donors. We then focused on HCoV-NL63 and detected broad T cell responses to the spike protein and identified 22 targeted peptides. Interestingly, only 1 study participant had a significant response to SARS-CoV-2 spike or nucleocapsid protein in the ELISPOT assay. In vitro expansion studies suggested that T cells specific for the HCoV-NL63 spike protein in this individual could also recognize SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peptide pools.CONCLUSIONHDs have circulating T cells specific for the spike proteins of HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, and HCoV-OC43. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins were present in only 1 participant and were potentially the result of cross-recognition by T cells specific for the common cold coronaviruses. Further studies are needed to determine whether this cross-recognition influences coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes.

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularAdultCommon ColdCoronavirus 229E, HumanCoronavirus NL63, HumanCoronavirus OC43, HumanCOVID-19Cross ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesAdaptive immunityImmunologyInfectious diseaseT cells

Identifiers

PMID32966269
PMCPMC7685719
OpenAlexW3087225540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.