Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966209›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Stoichiometric interactions explain spindle dynamics and scaling across 100 million years of nematode evolution.

Reza Farhadifar, Che-Hang Yu, Gunar Fabig, Hai-Yin Wu, David B Stein, Matthew Rockman, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Michael J Shelley, Daniel J Needleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Live-cell imaging under centrifugation characterized the cellular force for nuclear centration in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Enucleation of theLife science alliance · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Regulation of organelle size and organization during development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Reza FarhadifarDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-5380
Che-Hang Yu *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0353-9752
Gunar Fabig *Experimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-0978
Hai-Yin WuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.
David B SteinCenter for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, New York, United States.
Matthew RockmanDepartment of Biology and Center for Genomics & Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-8906
Thomas Müller-ReichertExperimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-1436
Michael J ShelleyCenter for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, New York, United States.
Daniel J NeedlemanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Understanding mitotic spindle positioning by integrated modeling and experimentR01GM104976 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SHELLEY, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
Genetic analysis of segregating recessive variationR01GM121828 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ROCKMAN, MATTHEW · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104976NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121828NIH HHS 1R01GM104976-01NIH HHS 1R01GM121828NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle shows remarkable diversity, and changes in an integrated fashion, as cells vary over evolution. Here, we provide a mechanistic explanation for variations in the first mitotic spindle in nematodes. We used a combination of quantitative genetics and biophysics to rule out broad classes of models of the regulation of spindle length and dynamics, and to establish the importance of a balance of cortical pulling forces acting in different directions. These experiments led us to construct a model of cortical pulling forces in which the stoichiometric interactions of microtubules and force generators (each force generator can bind only one microtubule), is key to explaining the dynamics of spindle positioning and elongation, and spindle final length and scaling with cell size. This model accounts for variations in all the spindle traits we studied here, both within species and across nematode species spanning over 100 million years of evolution.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCell SizeMicrotubulesSpindle ApparatusAnimalsEvolution, MolecularModels, BiologicalPhenotypeC. eleganscell biologycell divisioncortical forcesmathematical modelingmitotic spindlephysics of living systemsQTL mappingscaling

Identifiers

PMID32966209
PMCPMC7511230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.