Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966208›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of urology2021

Evidence-based protocol-led management of renal angiomyolipoma: A review of literature.

Sophie Vaggers, Patrick Rice, Bhaskar K Somani, Rajan Veeratterapillay, Bhavan P Rai

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of adult tuberous sclerosis complex-related angiomyolipoma: A single-center experience.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie VaggersUrological Surgery Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-7169
Patrick RiceUrological Surgery Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5687-6947
Bhaskar K SomaniUrological Surgery Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Rajan VeeratterapillayDepartment of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-9517
Bhavan P RaiDepartment of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-7246
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal angiomyolipomas (R-AMLs) are rare benign tumors, which occur sporadically and in association with genetic conditions such as tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). The key clinical concern is life-threatening hemorrhage. There is uncertainty about the optimal management strategy for patients with R-AMLs. We aim to review the evidence and provide a protocolled approach for the management of R-AMLs. A literature search of R-AML was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles published between January 1990 and March 2020. Patient with TSC and sporadic cases were included. Treatment strategies, including active surveillance, surgery, selective arterial embolization (SAE), ablation, and systemic therapies, were reviewed. Outcomes from contemporary case series of active surveillance, surgery, and SAE were collated. There were no randomized controlled trials on this topic. The retrospective case series reviewed showed that many R-AMLs can be managed safely with active surveillance. Tumor size is the most important predictor of bleeding, and other factors such as rate of growth, women of child-bearing age, aneurysm size, and symptoms should be considered when deciding on prophylactic treatment. There is limited evidence for the traditional 4-cm cutoff for treatment, which may lead to overtreatment. The primary intervention options are SAE and surgery; whereas SAE is a less invasive option, nephron sparing surgery offers a lower risk of recurrence. Both appear to have similar morbidity, and the current evidence does not recommend one over the other in most cases. Thermal ablation has promising results but has only been trialed in small case series. Patients with TSC can be offered mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors of which everolimus appears to cause the greatest shrinkage of tumors with an acceptable side-effect profile. R-AMLs should be assessed for their risk of bleeding. Low-risk tumors should be treated with active surveillance. High-risk tumors should be treated with SAE or surgery. Systemic treatments are the first-line of treatment for patients with TSC to preserve renal parenchyma.

Identifiers

PMID32966208
PMCPMC8057360
OpenAlexW3088066923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.