Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32966146›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Antenatal influenza vaccination in urban Pune, India: clinician and community stakeholders' awareness, priorities, and practices.

Joseph G Giduthuri, Vidula Purohit, Abhay Kudale, Jürg Utzinger, Christian Schindler, Mitchell G Weiss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph G GiduthuriSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1654-0389
Vidula PurohitThe Maharashtra Association of Anthropological Sciences, Centre for Health Research and Development, Pune, India.
Abhay KudaleThe Maharashtra Association of Anthropological Sciences, Centre for Health Research and Development, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-1636
Jürg UtzingerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian SchindlerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-2938
Mitchell G WeissSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-1332
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHMaharashtra Association of Anthropological Sciences · IN

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U50 CK000431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends antenatal influenza vaccination (AIV) for pregnant women at any stage of pregnancy. This study assessed fundamental aspects of AIV acceptance and demand among key stakeholders in urban Pune, India. Semi-structured interviews for rapid ethnographic assessment of AIV-related awareness, priorities, and practices were used to study clinicians and their communities of practice. A qualitative survey was conducted among 16 private clinicians providing antenatal care (ANC) in slum and middle-class areas of Pune. Following the survey, clinicians were informed about authoritative AIV recommendations. A qualitative community survey was also conducted with 60 women aged 20-35 years and 30 spouses from the same slum and middle-class practice areas of the ANC providers. Subsequently, a second clinician survey was conducted to assess changes in clinicians' awareness, priority, and vaccination practice. After this interview, clinicians were informed of community survey findings. Most community respondents were unaware of AIV, in contrast with well-known and widely used antenatal tetanus vaccination. They expressed confidence in vaccines and trust in the clinicians. Clinicians' advice was reportedly the most important determinant of community vaccine acceptance. Clinicians were confident of the safety of AIV and they anticipated patients' acceptance if recommended. The second clinician interview showed increased awareness of AIV policy, but clinicians were more skeptical about the severity of maternal influenza in their practice. Our findings indicate community acceptance though not demand for AIV. We recommend five essential elements for vaccination program strategies to improve coverage with AIV and other ANC vaccines.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesAntenatal influenza vaccinationcommunity vaccine recipientsIndiavaccination stakeholdersvaccine acceptancevaccine demandvaccine priority

Identifiers

PMID32966146
PMCPMC8018408
OpenAlexW3088349438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.