Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965726›Full record

ReviewVox sanguinis2021

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2: implications for blood safety and sufficiency.

Philip Kiely, Veronica C Hoad, Clive R Seed, Iain B Gosbell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vox sanguinis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Blood Safety: An Updated Review.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Confirmed circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in Irish blood donors prior to first national notification of infection.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Mapping of SARS-CoV-2 Brain Invasion and Histopathology in COVID-19 Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philip KielyCinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2849-7122
Veronica C HoadCinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-3661
Clive R SeedCinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-4507
Iain B GosbellCinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus, first identified in China at the end of 2019 and has now caused a worldwide pandemic. In this review, we provide an overview of the implications of SARS-CoV-2 for blood safety and sufficiency. MATERIAL AND

methodWe searched the PubMed database, the preprint sites bioRxiv and medRxiv, the websites of the World Health Organization, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the US Communicable Diseases Center and monitored ProMed updates.

resultsAn estimated 15%-46% of SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic. The reported mean incubation period is 3 to 7 days with a range of 1-14 days. The blood phase of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be brief and low level, with RNAaemia detectable in only a small proportion of patients, typically associated with more severe disease and not demonstrated to be infectious virus. An asymptomatic blood phase has not been demonstrated. Given these characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the absence of reported transfusion transmission (TT), the TT risk is currently theoretical. To mitigate any potential TT risk, but more importantly to prevent respiratory transmission in donor centres, blood centres can implement donor deferral policies based on travel, disease status or potential risk of exposure.

conclusionThe TT risk of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be low. The biggest risk to blood services in the current COVID-19 pandemic is to maintain the sufficiency of the blood supply while minimizing respiratory transmission of SARS-CoV-19 to donors and staff while donating blood.

Indexed as

Blood SafetyBlood TransfusionCOVID-19GeographyHumansRisk AssessmentRNA, ViralSafety ManagementSARS-CoV-2Transfusion ReactionWorld Health OrganizationRNA, Viralblood safetyepidemiologySARS-CoV-2transfusion - transmissible infections

Identifiers

PMID32965726
PMCPMC7537511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.