Observational studyJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2021
The clinical impact of untreated slow ventricular tachycardia in patients carrying implantable cardiac defibrillators.
Observational study in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe clinical impact of slow ventricular tachycardia (VT), occurring in patients carrying implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), is still under debate. METHODS AND
resultsFrom the UMBRELLA registry (multicenter, observational, and prospective study on patients with ICD), 659 episodes of slow VT were observed in 97 patients. Untreated slow VT (n = 93) had longer duration (23.7 min, CI95%: 10-39), compared with episodes treated effectively by anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP; n = 527; 0.32 min, IC95%: 0.22-0, 48) or shock (n = 39; 1 min, CI95%: 0.8-1.2). Despite of longer duration, the time to the first contact with the medical services was similar to those episodes treated by ATP (50 days [CI95%: 45-55] vs. 41 days [CI95%: 39-44]). However, both were significantly longer than the time observed in episodes treated with shock (10 days, CI95%: 6-15). This tendency was maintained with successive interrogations of the device (2nd and 3rd). There were no significant differences in mortality during follow-up (48 ± 16 months), neither other adverse outcomes, between patients who presented untreated slow TV and those who did not (log-rank p = 0.28). In a Cox regression analysis, the variable "presenting untreated episodes of slow VT" was not able to predict mortality. However, being in sinus rhythm (vs. atrial fibrillation, OR: 0.31, p = 0.009), narrower QRS (OR: 1.036, p = 0.037) and diabetes (OR 4.673, p = 0.049) appropriately predict survival.
conclusionsUntreated slow VT does not significantly worsen patient prognosis. Our results support the limitation of therapies to ATP only, thus avoiding therapies that have been associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.