Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965568›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2020

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Cognitive Functioning of Glioma Patients: a Systematic Review.

Adomas Bunevicius, Julie Miller, Michael Parsons

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutant Grade II and III Glial Neoplasms.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adomas BuneviciusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. a.bunevicius@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0446-6898
Julie MillerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael ParsonsHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIsocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status has important prognostic implications in glioma patients, with IDH wild-type (IDH-WT) gliomas being associated with worse prognosis and shorter survival when compared with IDH mutant (IDH-mut) gliomas. Optimization of quality of life is a priority in the management of glioma patients. The goal of this systematic review was to identify studies that explored the association of IDH mutation status with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and cognitive functioning of glioma patients. RECENT

findingsStudies that evaluated the association of IDH mutation status with PROs and/or cognitive functioning of glioma patients were identified from the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Clarivate analytics, and Google Scholar databases. Eight studies (7 journal articles and 2 conference abstracts) with a total of 658 low-grade glioma and high-grade glioma patients investigated the association of cognitive functioning and/or QoL with IDH status. IDH-WT status was associated with greater cognitive impairment relative to IDH-Mut status in three studies, while one study did not find the association between IDH status and perioperative cognitive functioning. One study reported worse postoperative cognitive functioning patients with IDH-WT vs. IDH-mut gliomas. In one study, IDH-WT status was linked to greater impairment on physical and communication functioning after surgery. IDH-WT gliomas are associated with greater cognitive burden than IDH-Mut tumors. The association of IDH status with QoL remains less clear. Assessment of IDH status should be considered when evaluating QoL and cognitive complaints of glioma patients. Further studies linking glioma molecular phenotypes with PROs and cognitive functioning are encouraged.

Indexed as

CognitionBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseCognitive functioningGliomaIsocitrate dehydrogenasePatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32965568
OpenAlexW3088672803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.