ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
Radiology-pathology correlation for bone and soft tissue tumors or tumor-like masses: single institutional experience after implementation of a weekly conference.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the frequency of non-diagnostic and discordant results from bone and soft tissue biopsies performed at our institution over a 3-year period and to investigate whether implementation of a weekly musculoskeletal radiology-pathology correlation conference decreased the time to appropriate patient management in cases of discordance.
methodsConsecutive image-guided core needle biopsy results obtained over a 12 month period of time were reviewed in a retrospective fashion. Following implementation of the correlation conference, subsequent consecutive image-guided core needle biopsy results obtained over a 26 month period of time were reviewed in a prospective fashion. For non-diagnostic and discordant cases, the time in days from date of availability of the biopsy result to date of documentation of a specific follow-up action plan was recorded.
resultsDiagnostic yield was 96.5% and 94.9% for the retrospective and prospective periods, respectively. There were four discordant results in the retrospective cohort (1.7%) and seven discordant results in the prospective cohort (2.1%). Following implementation of the weekly correlation conference, there was significant decrease (p < 0.05) in median time from a discordant biopsy result to follow-up action plan. There were no unnecessary surgeries, litigation, or other unfavorable consequences in either cohort.
conclusionImage-guided core needle biopsies of bone and soft tissue provide high diagnostic yield, often with specific diagnoses. The statistically significant decrease in number of days to follow-up action plan for discordant results suggests radiology-pathology review has a positive impact on patient care. Subjective benefits from communication and educational standpoints are also noteworthy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.