Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965546›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Simple Knee Value: a simple evaluation correlated to existing knee PROMs.

Vincent Marot, Arthur Justo, Amer Alshanquiti, Nicolas Reina, Franck Accadbled, Emilie Berard, Etienne Cavaignac

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07641868 (Management of Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07641868 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Management of Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee: The Benefits of an Autograft Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouis Pasteur Santé LorraineRan2026 to 2030Enrolled80ConditionsFocal Cartilage Lesions of the KneeArmsManagement of focal cartilage lesions of the knee: micro-fracture, Minced Cartilage Implantation (MCI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measurement properties of the Thai version of Simple Knee Value in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition: A prevalent issue in knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Restoration of preoperative tibial alignment improves functional results after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  12. Normo-or slightly overcorrection show better results after medial closing wedge high tibial osteotomy.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent MarotMusculoskeletal Institute, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, 1 place Baylac, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Arthur JustoMusculoskeletal Institute, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, 1 place Baylac, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Amer AlshanquitiMusculoskeletal Institute, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, 1 place Baylac, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas ReinaMusculoskeletal Institute, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, 1 place Baylac, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Franck AccadbledPediatric Orthopaedics Unit, Children Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Emilie BerardDepartment of Epidemiology, Health Economics and Public Health, UMR1027 INSERM-University of Toulouse III, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU), Toulouse, France.
Etienne CavaignacMusculoskeletal Institute, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, 1 place Baylac, 31000, Toulouse, France. cavaignac.etienne@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-7567
Hôpital Purpan · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Simple Knee Value (SKV) is an outcome score in which patients are asked to grade their knee function as a percentage of that of a normal knee. The primary aim of this study was to validate the SKV by measuring its correlation with existing knee-related PROMs.

methodsThis was a prospective study conducted at a teaching hospital to assess the SKV's validity. The study enrolled 47 young patients (16-54 years old), 49 older patients (≥ 55 years) and 30 healthy controls. A paper questionnaire consisting of the Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC and SKV was given to subjects three times (enrolment, 1-month preoperative visit and 6 months postoperative visit). The criterion validity of the SKV was determined by correlating it to existing knee PROMs using the Spearman correlation coefficient (S). SKV test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between two time points (initial consultation at enrolment and preoperative visit, reflecting the same clinical condition). Responsiveness to change was determined by comparing the SKV scores before and after surgery (enrolment consultation and 6 months postoperative). Discriminative ability was determined by comparing the SKV distribution in patients and controls.

resultsThere was a strong and significant correlation between the SKV and the gold standard Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS and WOMAC in the younger patients and the older patients (p < 0.0001). The reliability between the SKV at the initial consultation and before surgery was excellent (ICC 0.862, 95% CI 0.765; 0.921) in the younger patients, and moderate (ICC 0.506, 95% CI 0.265; 0.688) in the older patients. The SKV was responsive to change in both patient groups (p < 0.0001 for the SKV before versus 6 months after surgery). Like the other knee-specific PROMs (p < 0.0001), the SKV was able to distinguish between patients and controls (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThe SKV is valid as it is significantly correlated to existing knee PROMs. It is also reliable, responsive to change and discriminating. Its simplicity gives it many advantages and it can be used by physicians in their daily practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentAdultArthroplastyArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansKneeKnee InjuriesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultKnee evaluationPROMsSANESKV

Identifiers

PMID32965546
OpenAlexW3089122106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.