Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965536›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2020

Clinical situations for which 3D printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: adult cardiac conditions.

Arafat Ali, David H Ballard, Waleed Althobaity, Andy Christensen, Mariah Geritano, Michelle Ho, Peter Liacouras, Jane Matsumoto, Jonathan Morris, Justin Ryan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advanced 3D Visualization and 3D Printing in Radiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Arafat AliDepartment of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Alia4@ucmail.uc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-8991
David H BallardMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Waleed AlthobaityKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Andy ChristensenDepartment of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mariah GeritanoBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle HoSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Peter Liacouras3D Medical Applications Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Jane MatsumotoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jonathan MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Justin RyanRady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Rami ShortiIntermountain Healthcare, South Jordan, UT, USA.
Nicole WakeDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Frank J RybickiDepartment of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Adnan SheikhDepartment of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
RSNA 3D Printing Special Interest Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical 3D printing as a component of care for adults with cardiovascular diseases has expanded dramatically. A writing group composed of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (SIG) provides appropriateness criteria for adult cardiac 3D printing indications.

methodsA structured literature search was conducted to identify all relevant articles using 3D printing technology associated with a number of adult cardiac indications, physiologic, and pathologic processes. Each study was vetted by the authors and graded according to published guidelines.

resultsEvidence-based appropriateness guidelines are provided for the following areas in adult cardiac care; cardiac fundamentals, perioperative and intraoperative care, coronary disease and ischemic heart disease, complications of myocardial infarction, valve disease, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac neoplasm, cardiac transplant and mechanical circulatory support, heart failure, preventative cardiology, cardiac and pericardial disease and cardiac trauma.

conclusionsAdoption of common clinical standards regarding appropriate use, information and material management, and quality control are needed to ensure the greatest possible clinical benefit from 3D printing. This consensus guideline document, created by the members of the RSNA 3D printing Special Interest Group, will provide a reference for clinical standards of 3D printing for adult cardiac indications.

Indexed as

3D printingAdditive ManufacturingAdult CardiologyAnatomic ModelAppropriatenessGuidelinesLeft Atrial AppendageQualityRadiologyTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Identifiers

PMID32965536
PMCPMC7510265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.