Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965532›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2020

[Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the diagnosis of soft-tissue and bone tumors].

Stefanie Bertram, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Heat-induced antigen retrieval in fluorescenceExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefanie BertramInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. stefanie.bertram@uk-essen.de.
Hans-Ulrich SchildhausInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal tumors, especially high-grade sarcomas, frequently harbor chaotic genotypes. Few tumors arise in association with genetic tumor predisposition syndromes with germline mutations in tumor suppressor genes. An increasing number of soft-tissue and bone tumors are characterized by recurrent genomic alterations, which can be utilized for diagnostic purposes. These include translocations and amplifications and less frequently deletions. These alterations can be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization among other techniques. The rising number of whole genome sequencing of soft-tissue and bone tumors leads to an improved understanding of tumor genetics. On this basis, fluorescence in situ hybridization has gained relevance as a diagnostic tool. This review covers relevant genetic alterations in lipomatous tumors, soft-tissue tumors with spindle-cell and epithelioid morphology, vascular tumors, small-blue-round-cell tumors, and bone tumors that are detectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansTranslocation, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorAmplificationDeletionMesenchymal tumorSarcomaTranslocation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.