Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965511›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Correction to Effect of vitamin K on bone mineral density and fractures in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

A Mott, T Bradley, K Wright, E S Cockayne, M J Shearer, J Adamson, S A Lanham-New, D J Torgerson

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Exercise therapy and basic treatment for osteoporosis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A MottYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK. andrew.mott@york.ac.uk.
T BradleyChesterfield Hospital, Chesterfield Road, Calow, S44 5BL, UK.
K WrightCentre for Reviews & Dissemination, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
E S CockayneYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
M J ShearerCentre for Haemostasis and Thrombosis, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
J AdamsonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
S A Lanham-NewNutritional Sciences Department, School of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, Guildford, UK.
D J TorgersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the work of Avenell et al. that has raised concerns about the integrity of the Yamaguchi Osteoporosis Prevention Study (YOPS) conducted by Ishida and Kawai we issue here an adjustment to all meta-analysis estimates that contained this work within our systematic review.

Identifiers

PMID32965511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.