Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965504›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2020

Efficacy of Biologics Targeting Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-17 -12/23, -23 and Small Molecules Targeting JAK and PDE4 in the Treatment of Nail Psoriasis: A Network Meta-analysis.

Júlia Szebényi, Noémi Gede, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Szakács, Margit Solymár, Bálint Erőss, András Garami, Kornélia Farkas, Dezső Csupor, Rolland Gyulai

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Júlia SzebényiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Oncodermatology, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7622 Pécs, Hungary.
Noémi Gede
Péter Hegyi
Zsolt Szakács
Margit Solymár
Bálint Erőss
András Garami
Kornélia Farkas
Dezső Csupor
Rolland Gyulai
Path BioAnalytics (United States) · USUniversity of Pecs · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparative efficacy of registered anti-psoriatic biologics and small molecules in treating nail symptoms has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of biologics and small mole-cules in nail psoriasis. A Bayesian network meta- analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials (a total of 6,053 nail psoriatic patients) was performed, comparing the short-term (week 10-16) efficacy of biologics and small molecules in the treatment of nail psoriasis. All active treatments were found to be superior to place-bo. Ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) % improvement, Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA)=0.92) and etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (probability of achiev-ing NAPSI 50, SUCRA=0.82) proved the best short-term treatment options. However, efficacy end-points in psoriasis trials were not optimized for nail assessment, and outcome parameters were highly heterogeneous, limiting comparability. In conclusion, outcome parameters and efficacy endpoints of nail psoriasis trials should be standardized.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsNail DiseasesPsoriasisAntibodies, MonoclonalBayes TheoremHumansInterleukin-17Interleukin-23Treatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological ProductsInterleukin-17Interleukin-23Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphabiologicsefficacynail psoriasisNail Psoriasis Severity Indexnetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32965504
PMCPMC9309877
OpenAlexW3088011878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.