ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association of Pregnancy With Recurrence of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Among Women With Prior Coronary Artery Dissection.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01429727 (The "Virtual" Multicenter Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The "Virtual" Multicenter Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) Registry
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Postpartum spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by ventricular fibrillation: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Report of the iSCAD Registry.JAMA cardiology · 2026Article
- A Contemporary Review of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: CLINICAL CARE, CARDIAC REHABILITATION, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2026Review
- Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a 32-Year-Old Woman With Postpartum Hemorrhage.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Imaging in MI with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: Unraveling Pathophysiology and Guiding Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current Knowledge, Research Gaps, and Innovative Research Initiatives:JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- Specialized clinics for patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Guidance Directed Care of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Healthcare System-Based Experience.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Coronary Artery Tortuosity and Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association With Echocardiography and Global Longitudinal Strain, Fibromuscular Dysplasia, and Outcomes.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2024Article
- Spectrum of Ischemic Heart Disease Throughout a Woman's Life Cycle.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in women in the generative period: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a focus on post-dissection care for the vascular medicine clinician.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Pregnancy After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Counseling Patients Who Intend Future Pregnancy.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: hematoma, not thrombus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women: A Literature Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2023Review
- Sex and Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Disease: A Review of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.US cardiology · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a notable cause of acute coronary syndrome in women of childbearing age. Objective: To test the hypothesis that pregnancy after SCAD is associated with recurrent SCAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three study designs were implemented: a case series of women with pregnancy after SCAD; a nested case-control study comparing patients with recurrent SCAD to matched controls without recurrent SCAD; and a cohort study. Women with SCAD who were of childbearing potential and enrolled into the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry from August 30, 2011, to April 4, 2019, were included in the study. Patients with coronary dissections associated with iatrogenesis, trauma, or atherosclerosis were not enrolled. Exposures: Pregnancy after SCAD. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was SCAD recurrence, defined as an acute coronary syndrome or cardiac arrest due to new SCAD. Other demographic measures collected included age, year of SCAD occurrence, and comorbidities. Results: The cohort included 636 women of childbearing potential. Twenty-three of those women had a total of 32 pregnancies after SCAD. The median (interquartile range) age of women with pregnancy after SCAD was 38 years (34-40 years), and 20 (87%) were White. In the nested case-control study, 92 cases of recurrent SCAD were matched to 158 controls. There was no significant difference in exposure to subsequent pregnancies in the women with recurrent SCAD as compared with matched controls (2 of 92 [2%] vs 13 of 158 [8%]; P = .06). In the overall cohort of 636 patients, recurrent SCAD was present in 122 patients with a Kaplan-Meier 5-year SCAD recurrence estimate of 14.8%. The Cox analysis showed no significant association between subsequent pregnancy and SCAD recurrence with a nonsignificant hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.09-1.6) when controlling for age at first SCAD, year of first SCAD, and fibromuscular dysplasia. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that most women tolerated pregnancy and lactation after SCAD without evidence for increased risk of SCAD recurrence when compared with women with a history of SCAD who did not experience pregnancy. Although this study is reassuring and indicates complex contributors to SCAD recurrence, the results need to be interpreted prudently because of study selection bias and the small total number of women who became pregnant after SCAD. The notable hemodynamic changes that occur with pregnancy and severe presentation of pregnancy-associated SCAD are reasons for concern when considering pregnancy after SCAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.