Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965500›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Association of Pregnancy With Recurrence of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Among Women With Prior Coronary Artery Dissection.

Marysia S Tweet, Kathleen A Young, Patricia J M Best, Meredith Hyun, Rajiv Gulati, Carl H Rose, Sharonne N Hayes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01429727 (The "Virtual" Multicenter Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01429727 recruitingnot on this map

The "Virtual" Multicenter Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) Registry

TypeobservationalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2011 to 2030Enrolled2,500ConditionsSpontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection, SCAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Specialized clinics for patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Coronary Artery Tortuosity and Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association With Echocardiography and Global Longitudinal Strain, Fibromuscular Dysplasia, and Outcomes.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2024
    Article
  13. Spectrum of Ischemic Heart Disease Throughout a Woman's Life Cycle.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women: A Literature Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marysia S TweetDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kathleen A YoungDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patricia J M BestDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Meredith HyunDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rajiv GulatiDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Carl H RoseDivision of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sharonne N HayesDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a notable cause of acute coronary syndrome in women of childbearing age. Objective: To test the hypothesis that pregnancy after SCAD is associated with recurrent SCAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three study designs were implemented: a case series of women with pregnancy after SCAD; a nested case-control study comparing patients with recurrent SCAD to matched controls without recurrent SCAD; and a cohort study. Women with SCAD who were of childbearing potential and enrolled into the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry from August 30, 2011, to April 4, 2019, were included in the study. Patients with coronary dissections associated with iatrogenesis, trauma, or atherosclerosis were not enrolled. Exposures: Pregnancy after SCAD. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was SCAD recurrence, defined as an acute coronary syndrome or cardiac arrest due to new SCAD. Other demographic measures collected included age, year of SCAD occurrence, and comorbidities. Results: The cohort included 636 women of childbearing potential. Twenty-three of those women had a total of 32 pregnancies after SCAD. The median (interquartile range) age of women with pregnancy after SCAD was 38 years (34-40 years), and 20 (87%) were White. In the nested case-control study, 92 cases of recurrent SCAD were matched to 158 controls. There was no significant difference in exposure to subsequent pregnancies in the women with recurrent SCAD as compared with matched controls (2 of 92 [2%] vs 13 of 158 [8%]; P = .06). In the overall cohort of 636 patients, recurrent SCAD was present in 122 patients with a Kaplan-Meier 5-year SCAD recurrence estimate of 14.8%. The Cox analysis showed no significant association between subsequent pregnancy and SCAD recurrence with a nonsignificant hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.09-1.6) when controlling for age at first SCAD, year of first SCAD, and fibromuscular dysplasia. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that most women tolerated pregnancy and lactation after SCAD without evidence for increased risk of SCAD recurrence when compared with women with a history of SCAD who did not experience pregnancy. Although this study is reassuring and indicates complex contributors to SCAD recurrence, the results need to be interpreted prudently because of study selection bias and the small total number of women who became pregnant after SCAD. The notable hemodynamic changes that occur with pregnancy and severe presentation of pregnancy-associated SCAD are reasons for concern when considering pregnancy after SCAD.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdultCase-Control StudiesCoronary Vessel AnomaliesFemaleHeart ArrestHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularProportional Hazards ModelsRecurrenceRegistriesVascular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID32965500
PMCPMC7512056
OpenAlexW3088025597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.