ArticleJournal of vision2020
A method to characterize compensatory oculomotor strategies following simulated central vision loss.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of extended reality (XR) for understanding and augmenting vision loss.Journal of vision · 2023Pooled it
- Examining oculomotor behavior in central vision loss with a gaze-contingent display.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Consistency of preferred retinal locus across tasks and participants trained with a simulated scotoma.Vision research · 2023Article
- A gaze-contingent saccadic re-referencing training with simulated central vision loss.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Training With Simulated Scotoma Leads to Behavioral Improvements Through at Least Two Distinct Mechanisms.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Oculomotor changes following learned use of an eccentric retinal locus.Vision research · 2022Article
- Oculomotor responses of the visual system to an artificial central scotoma may not represent genuine visuomotor adaptation.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Perspectives on the Combined Use of Electric Brain Stimulation and Perceptual Learning in Vision.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022Review
- Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- We don't all look the same; detailed examination of peripheral looking strategies after simulated central vision loss.Journal of vision · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Loss of central vision can be partially compensated by increased use of peripheral vision. For example, patients experiencing central vision loss due to disease (macular degeneration) or healthy participants trained with simulated central vision loss, tend to develop eccentric fixation spots for reading or other visual tasks. In both patients and in simulated conditions, there are substantial individual variations in the effective use of the periphery. The factors driving these individual differences are still unclear. Although early approaches have described some dimensions of these strategies, the field is still in its initial stages and important elements are often conflated when examining gaze patterns. Here, we propose a systematic approach to characterize oculomotor strategies in cases of central vision loss that distinguishes different components: saccadic re-referencing, saccadic precision, first saccade landing dispersion, fixation stability, latency of target acquisition, and percentage of trials that are useful. We tested this approach in healthy individuals trained with a gaze-contingent display obstructing the central 10 degrees of the visual field. The use of simulated scotoma helps overcome known challenges in clinical research, from recruitment and compliance to the diverse extent and nature of the visual loss. Importantly, this approach offers the ability to examine oculomotor strategies as they develop in controlled settings where viewing conditions are similar across participants. Results show substantial differences in characteristics of peripheral looking strategies, both across trials and individuals. This more complete characterization of peripheral looking strategies can help us understand individual differences in rehabilitation after central vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.