Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965237›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Telomerase Activation to Reverse Immunosenescence in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomized Pilot Trial.

Rebecca Maier, Bilal Bawamia, Karim Bennaceur, Sarah Dunn, Leanne Marsay, Roland Amoah, Adetayo Kasim, Andrew Filby, David Austin, Helen Hancock and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The role of T cells in vascular aging, hypertension, and atherosclerosis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fractalkine Signalling (CXJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca MaierNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-3288
Bilal BawamiaJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-7544
Karim BennaceurInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1328-5706
Sarah DunnNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1901-3931
Leanne MarsayNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0690-5658
Roland AmoahInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5501-4675
Adetayo KasimWolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-3059
Andrew FilbyFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9078-4360
David AustinJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-1055
Helen HancockNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-8551
Ioakim SpyridopoulosInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-2444
Newcastle University · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBDurham University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of coronary heart disease (CHD) and its acute manifestation, acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Aging is associated with a decline of the immune system, a process known as immunosenescence. This is characterized by an increase in highly proinflammatory T cells that are involved in CHD progression, plaque destabilization, and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Telomere dysfunction has been implicated in immunosenescence of T lymphocytes. Telomerase is the enzyme responsible for maintaining telomeres during cell divisions. It has a protective effect on cells under oxidative stress and helps regulate flow-mediated dilation in microvasculature.

objectiveThe TACTIC (Telomerase ACTivator to reverse Immunosenescence in Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial will investigate whether a telomerase activator, TA-65MD, can reduce the proportion of senescent T cells in patients with ACS with confirmed CHD. It will also assess the effect of TA-65MD on decreasing telomere shortening, reducing oxidative stress, and improving endothelial function.

methodsThe study was designed as a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Recruitment started in January 2019. A total of 90 patients, aged 65 years or older, with treated ACS who have had CHD confirmed by angiography will be enrolled. They will be randomized to one of two groups: TA-65MD oral therapy (8 mg twice daily) or placebo taken for 12 months. The primary outcome is the effect on immunosenescence determined by a decrease in the proportion of CD8+ TEMRA (T effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA [CD45 expressing exon A]) cells at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include leukocyte telomere length, endothelial function, cardiac function as measured by echocardiography and NT-proBNP (N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide), systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and telomerase activity.

resultsThe study received National Health Service (NHS) ethics approval on August 9, 2018; Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency approval on October 19, 2018; and NHS Health Research Authority approval on October 22, 2018. The trial began recruiting participants in January 2019 and completed recruitment in March 2020; the trial is due to report results in 2021.

conclusionsThis pilot trial in older patients with CHD will explore outcomes not previously investigated outside in vitro or preclinical models. The robust design ensures that bias has been minimized. Should the results indicate reduced frequency of immunosenescent CD8+ T cells as well as improvements in telomere length and endothelial function, we will plan a larger, multicenter trial in patients to determine if TA-65MD is beneficial in the treatment of CHD in elderly patients.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN16613292; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16613292 and European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), European Union Clinical Trials Register 2017-002876-26; https://tinyurl.com/y4m2so8g. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/19456.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromecoronary heart diseaseimmunosenescencetelomerase activator

Identifiers

PMID32965237
PMCPMC7542409
OpenAlexW3041807032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.