Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965223›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

The Impact of Previsit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Activation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jeana M Holt, Rachel Cusatis, Aaron Winn, Onur Asan, Charles Spanbauer, Joni S Williams, Kathryn E Flynn, Melek Somai, Purushottam Laud, Bradley H Crotty

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03766841 (Avoiding Health Disparities When Collecting Patient Contextual Data for Clinical Care and Pragmatic Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03766841 nacompletednot on this map

Avoiding Health Disparities When Collecting Patient Contextual Data for Clinical Care and Pragmatic Research

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2019 to 2019Enrolled301ConditionsCommunicationArmsFacilitated Enrollment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeana M Holt *College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-0164
Rachel Cusatis *Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6252-6516
Aaron Winn *School of Pharmacy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2906-3913
Onur Asan *School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-3723
Charles Spanbauer *Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5567-0026
Joni S Williams *Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Center for Advancing Population Science, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-3556
Kathryn E Flynn *Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4427-3583
Melek Somai *Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-9681
Purushottam Laud *Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-4193
Bradley H Crotty *Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6271-4816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-centered care is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values. To provide patient-centered care, clinicians need to know and incorporate patients' context into their communication and care with patients. Patient contextual data (PCD) encompass social determinants of health and patients' needs, values, goals, and preferences relevant to their care. PCD can be challenging to collect as a routine component of the time-limited primary care visit.

objectiveThis study aims to determine if patient-provider communication and patient activation are different for patient users and patient nonusers of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated PCD tool and assess if the impact of using PCD on patient-provider communication and patient activation differs for Black and White patients.

methodsWe describe a randomized controlled trial of a prospective cohort of non-Hispanic White and Black patients who receive primary care services at a midwestern academic health care system in the United States. We will evaluate whether providing PCD through a consumer informatics tool enhances patient-provider communication, as measured by the Communication Assessment Tool, and we will evaluate patient activation, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure for PCD tool users and nonusers. Furthermore, owing to racial disparities in care and communication, we seek to determine if the adoption and use of the tool might narrow the differences between patient groups.

resultsThe trial was funded in November 2017 and received local ethics review approval in February 2019. The study began recruitment in April 2019 and enrollment concluded in October 2019 with 301 participants. The analysis was completed in May 2020, and trial results are expected to be published in winter 2020.

conclusionsRecently, there has been increased attention to the role of health information technology tools to enable patients to collaborate with providers through the sharing of PCD. The adoption of such tools may overcome the barriers of current EHRs by directly engaging patients to submit their contextual data. Effectively, these tools would support the EHR in providing a more holistic understanding of the patient. Research further supports that individuals who have robust digital engagement using consumer informatics tools have higher participation in treatment follow-up and self-care across populations. Therefore, it is critical to investigate interventions that elicit and share patients' social risks and care preferences with the health care team as a mechanism to improve individualized care and reduce the gap in health outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03766841; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03766841. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/20309.

Indexed as

consumer health informaticsmobile phonepatient-centered carepatient participationphysician-patient relationsrandomized controlled trialvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID32965223
PMCPMC7542405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.