Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32965153›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Situating the left-lateralized language network in the broader organization of multiple specialized large-scale distributed networks.

Rodrigo M Braga, Lauren M DiNicola, Hannah C Becker, Randy L Buckner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Extended Language Network: Language-Responsive Brain Areas Whose Contributions to Language Remain To Be Discovered.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Rodrigo M BragaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Lauren M DiNicolaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7562-0755
Hannah C BeckerDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Randy L BucknerDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · US

Funding

The neural network of OCD, linking NHP and human studiesP50MH106435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI STEVEN A RASMUSSEN · 2015 to 2026
$28.9M
Upgrade Siemens MAGNETOM Trio to MAGNETOM Prisma Fit 3T Human MRI SystemS10OD020039 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
Causal mechanisms of distributed brain network function during episodic memory retrievalK99MH117226 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRAGA, RODRIGO M · 2018 to 2019
$254k
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) P50MH106435HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) S10OD020039HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) K99MH117226National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-1745303NIH HHS S10 OD020039NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH117226NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106435Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 103980/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using procedures optimized to explore network organization within the individual, the topography of a candidate language network was characterized and situated within the broader context of adjacent networks. The candidate network was first identified using functional connectivity and replicated across individuals, acquisition tasks, and analytical methods. In addition to classical language regions near the perisylvian cortex and temporal pole, regions were also observed in dorsal posterior cingulate, midcingulate, and anterior superior frontal and inferior temporal cortex. The candidate network was selectively activated when processing meaningful (as contrasted with nonword) sentences, whereas spatially adjacent networks showed minimal or even decreased activity. Results were replicated and triplicated across two prospectively acquired cohorts. Examined in relation to adjacent networks, the topography of the language network was found to parallel the motif of other association networks, including the transmodal association networks linked to theory of mind and episodic remembering (often collectively called the default network). The several networks contained juxtaposed regions in multiple association zones. Outside of these juxtaposed higher-order networks, we further noted a distinct frontotemporal network situated between language regions and a frontal orofacial motor region and a temporal auditory region. A possibility is that these functionally related sensorimotor regions might anchor specialization of neighboring association regions that develop into a language network. What is most striking is that the canonical language network appears to be just one of multiple similarly organized, differentially specialized distributed networks that populate the evolutionarily expanded zones of human association cortex.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysYoung AdultBroca’s areadistributed association networksintrinsic functional connectivitylanguageWernicke’s area

Identifiers

PMID32965153
PMCPMC8356783
OpenAlexW3088131600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.