ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020
Artificial intelligence in detection and segmentation of internal auditory canal and its nerves using deep learning techniques.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intelligent segmentation and measurement based on U-HRCT to explore the anatomical characteristics of the inner ear in unilateral Meniere's disease: a retrospective quantitative study.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Image-based deep learning in otology: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Automated facial nerve identification in microsurgery with an improved unet.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric otolaryngology: A state-of-the-art review of opportunities and pitfalls.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2025Review
- Clinical application of high-resolution spiral CT scanning in the diagnosis of auriculotemporal and ossicle.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Intelligent analysis and measurement of semicircular canal spatial attitude.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Temporal Bone Imaging: Advances and Future Challenges.Cureus · 2023Review
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Otitis Media with Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Research and application progress in deep learning in otology.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- A Novel U-Net Based Deep Learning Method for 3D Cardiovascular MRI Segmentation.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging is a burgeoning topic that involves the interpretation of complex image structures. The recent advancements in deep learning techniques increase the computational powers to extract vital features without human intervention. The automatic detection and segmentation of subtle tissue such as the internal auditory canal (IAC) and its nerves is a challenging task, and it can be improved using deep learning techniques.
methodsThe main scope of this research is to present an automatic method to detect and segment the IAC and its nerves like the facial nerve, cochlear nerve, inferior vestibular nerve, and superior vestibular nerve. To address this issue, we propose a Mask R-CNN approach driven with U-net to detect and segment the IAC and its nerves. The Mask R-CNN with its backbone network of the RESNET50 model learns a background-based localization policy to produce an actual bounding box of the IAC. Furthermore, the U-net segments the structure related information of IAC and its nerves by learning its features.
resultsThe proposed method was experimented on clinical datasets of 50 different patients including adults and children. The localization of IAC using Mask R-CNN was evaluated using Intersection of Union (IoU), and segmentation of IAC and its nerves was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient.
conclusionsThe localization result shows that mean IoU of RESNET50, RESNET101 are 0.79 and 0.74, respectively. The Dice similarity coefficient of IAC and its nerves using region growing, PSO and U-net method scored 92%, 94%, and 96%, respectively. The result shows that the proposed method outperform better in localization and segmentation of IAC and its nerves. Thus, AI aids the radiologists in making the right decisions as the localization and segmentation of IAC is accurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32964338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.