Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964336›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Empiric cone-beam CT-guided embolization in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Laurens Hermie, Elisabeth Dhondt, Peter Vanlangenhove, Jan De Waele, Helena Degroote, Luc Defreyne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurens HermieDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Laurens.Hermie@uzgent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-539X
Elisabeth DhondtDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter VanlangenhoveDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan De WaeleDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Helena DegrooteDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Luc DefreyneDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the clinical effect and safety of cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided empirical embolization for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) in patients with a positive CT angiography (CTA) but subsequent negative digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

methodsA retrospective study of consecutive LGIB patients with a positive CTA who received a DSA within 24 h from January 2008 to July 2019. Patients with a positive DSA were treated with targeted embolization (TE group). Patients with a negative DSA underwent an empiric CBCT-guided embolization of the assumed ruptured vas rectum (EE group) or no embolization (NE group). Recurrent bleeding, major ischemic complications, and in-hospital mortality were compared by means of Fisher's exact test. Further subgroup analysis was performed on hemodynamic instability.

resultsEighty-five patients (67.6 years ± 15.7, 52 men) were included (TE group, n = 47; EE group, n = 19; NE group, n = 19). If DSA was positive, technical success of targeted embolization was 100% (47/47). If DSA was negative and the intention to treat by empiric CBCT-guided embolization, technical success was 100% (19/19). Recurrent bleeding rates in the TE group, EE group, and NE group were 17.0% (8/47), 21.1% (4/19), and 52.6% (10/19) respectively. Empiric CBCT-guided embolization reduced rebleeding significantly in patients with a negative DSA and hemodynamic instability (EE group, 3/10 vs NE group, 10/12, p = .027). Major ischemic complications occurred in one patient (TE group). Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate was 7.1% (6/85).

conclusionEmpiric cone-beam CT-guided embolization proved to be a feasible, effective, and safe treatment strategy to reduce rebleeding and improve clinical success in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute LGIB, positive CTA but negative DSA. KEY POINTS: • A novel transarterial embolization technique guided by cone-beam CT could be developed extending the "empiric" embolization strategy to lower gastrointestinal bleeding. • By implementing the empiric treatment strategy, nearly all patients with an active lower gastrointestinal bleeding on CTA will be eligible for a superselective empiric embolization, even if subsequent catheter angiography is negative. • In patients with a negative catheter angiography, empiric embolization reduces the rebleeding rate and, particularly in hemodynamically unstable patients, improves clinical success compared with a conservative "wait-and-see" management.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticGastrointestinal HemorrhageAngiography, Digital SubtractionCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCone-beam computed tomographyEmbolization, therapeuticEndovascular proceduresGastrointestinal hemorrhageLower gastrointestinal tract

Identifiers

PMID32964336
OpenAlexW3088794501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.