Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964314›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2021

Circadian Regulation of GluA2 mRNA Processing in the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus and Other Brain Structures.

Hana Míková, Viktor Kuchtiak, Irena Svobodová, Veronika Spišská, Dominika Pačesová, Aleš Balík, Zdeňka Bendová

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hana MíkováFaculty of Science, Department of Physiology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Viktor KuchtiakInstitute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Irena SvobodováInstitute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Veronika SpišskáFaculty of Science, Department of Physiology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Dominika PačesováFaculty of Science, Department of Physiology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Aleš BalíkFaculty of Science, Department of Physiology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic. ales.balik@fgu.cas.cz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-6095
Zdeňka BendováFaculty of Science, Department of Physiology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic. zdenka.bendova@natur.cuni.cz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-2143
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007444Grantová Agentura České Republiky 19-17037SGrantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 1030217National Sustainability Program II CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109Research Project of the AS CR RVO 67985823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian circadian system consists of a major circadian pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus and peripheral clocks in the body, including brain structures. The SCN depends on glutamatergic neurotransmission for transmitting signals from the retina, and it exhibits spontaneous 24-h rhythmicity in neural activity. The aim of this work was to evaluate the degree and circadian rhythmicity of AMPA receptor GluA2 subunit R/G editing and alternative flip/flop splicing in the SCN and other brain structures in Wistar rats. Our data show that the circadian rhythmicity in the SCN's GluA2 mRNA level was highest at dawn, while the circadian rhythm in R/G editing peaked at CT10 and the rhythmic flip varied with the acrophase at the late subjective night. The circadian rhythmicity was confirmed for R/G editing and splicing in the CA3 hippocampal area, and rhythmic variation of the flip isoform was also measured in the olfactory bulbs and cerebellum. The correlations between the R/G editing and alternative flip/flop splicing revealed a structure-dependent direction. In the hippocampus, the edited (G)-form level was positively correlated with the flip variant abundance, in accord with published data; by contrast, in the SCN, the flip variant was in associated more with the unedited (R) form. The edited (G) form and flop isoform also predominated in the retina and cerebellum.

Indexed as

AnimalsCircadian RhythmExonsMaleRatsRats, WistarReceptors, AMPARNA EditingRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSuprachiasmatic Nucleusglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Receptors, AMPARNA, MessengerCircadian clockGluA2 subunitRatR/G editingSuprachiasmatic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID32964314
OpenAlexW3088962233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.