ArticleClinical oral investigations2021
Multicenter study to develop and validate a risk assessment tool as part of composite scoring system for erosive tooth wear.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a cycling protocol for the in vitro assessment of enamel erosion and the effect of a fluoridated mouthrinse containing micrometric- and nano-sized trimetaphosphate on erosion prevention.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Association Between Consumption of Energy and Sports Drinks with Oral Health: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Erosive tooth wear and its associated factors by tooth surfaces among a group of Finnish adults: a pilot study.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Tooth Wear in Older Adults: A Review of Clinical Studies.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The association between erosive tooth wear and diet, hygiene habits and health awareness in adolescents aged 15 in Poland.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022Article
- Validation of an erosive tooth wear risk factors questionnaire for adolescents.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Erosive Tooth Wear and Associated Dietary Factors among a Group of Finnish Adolescents.Caries research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives(i) To develop, validate, and apply in practice a new risk assessment tool for erosive tooth wear (ETW) including a risk factors questionnaire and a saliva secretion evaluation, which combined with a clinical index, can be part of an ETW composite scoring system; (ii) to assess ETW lesions and current and past erosive challenges in younger age groups.
methodsThe Tooth Surface Loss/Erosion Working Group of the European Association of Dental Public Health consisted of an international panel of experts designed the survey component of the new tool (Erosive Wear Assessment of Risk-EWAR) and confirmed its construct and content validity. After receiving ethical approvals and informed consents, the EWAR tool (questionnaire + saliva secretion evaluation) was applied in a multicenter cross-sectional study with 207 participants aged 15-21 years old from four countries (Finland, Greece, Romania, the USA). BEWE score was used for the clinical assessment of ETW.
resultsA total of 58.5% of participants had ETW. 10.9% and 20.3% of participants had low secretion of stimulated (< 1 ml/min) and unstimulated saliva (< 0.25 ml/min), respectively. The following factors were bivariately significantly associated with ETW: energy drink consumption, low secretion of stimulated saliva, juices consumption, erosive drink consumption for quenching thirst between meals, erosive drink kept in the mouth, feeling pain/icing after consuming something acidic or cold, and co-existence of other type of tooth wear. In regression analysis, only energy drink consumption (OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.39, 8.9), low secretion of stimulated saliva (OR = 36.3, 95% CI: 4.71, 78.94), and feeling pain/icing (OR = 8.8, 95% CI: 1.92, 40.04) remained significant.
conclusionsThe examiners of the study reported that the EWAR tool appeared to be an affordable and easy-to-use instrument. Some challenges occurred during the saliva collection process. Inferential analysis revealed that the risk factors/indicators of low stimulated salivary flow, energy drink consumption, and pain/icing with ETW were considered the most important in ETW occurrence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EWAR tool combined with the BEWE clinical index can be used for ETW risk assessment for epidemiological studies and chairside use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32964309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.