Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964305›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2021

Prospective observational study of abdominal wall reconstruction with THT technique in primary midline defects with diastasis recti: clinical and functional outcomes in 110 consecutive patients.

A Carrara, M Catarci, L Fabris, M Zuolo, L Pellecchia, P Moscatelli, A Dorna, M Motter, R Pertile, G Tirone

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Abdominoplasty and rectus diastasis repair-a plastic surgeon's perspective.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Review
  10. Economic value of diastasis repair with the use of mesh compared to no intervention in Italy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A CarraraFirst General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Via Grazioli n.77, 38122, Trento, Italy. alessandro.carrara@apss.tn.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9508-335X
M CatarciGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale Mazzoni, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
L FabrisGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale Valli del Noce, Cles (Tn), Italy.
M ZuoloGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale Valli del Noce, Cles (Tn), Italy.
L PellecchiaFirst General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Via Grazioli n.77, 38122, Trento, Italy.
P MoscatelliFirst General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Via Grazioli n.77, 38122, Trento, Italy.
A DornaGeneral Surgery Unit, Ospedale Di Cavalese, Cavalese (Tn), Italy.
M MotterFirst General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Via Grazioli n.77, 38122, Trento, Italy.
R PertileGovernance Department, Clinical and Evaluative Epidemiology Service, APSS Trento, Italy.
G TironeFirst General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Via Grazioli n.77, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Chiara · ITOspedale Valduce · ITOspedale Maggiore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical treatment of diastasis recti is still a matter of debate. Open approaches such as abdominoplasty, which offer the possibility to combine reparation of the diastasis with abdominal cosmetic surgery, are challenged by the emerging less-invasive laparoscopic or robotic techniques that offer shorter recovery for patients. However, evidence in favour of one of the two approaches concerning both short- and long-term complications and functional results is still lacking. In this paper, we analysed clinical and functional results of a new endo-laparoscopic technique for midline reconstruction (THT technique) in patients with primary abdominal wall defects associated with diastasis recti.

methodsProspective observational study on 110 consecutive patients was submitted to endo-laparoscopic reconstruction of the abdominal wall with linear staplers. Morbidity and relapse rates with clinical and radiological follow-up were recorded at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation. Data regarding the impact of surgery on patients' quality of life (EuraHSQol) on chronic low back pain (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) and urinary stress incontinence (Incontinence Severity Index, ISI) were gathered.

resultsAfter a mean follow-up of 14 months, the morbidity rate was 9.1% and no recurrences were recorded. 6-month follow-up ultrasound showed a rectus muscles mean distance of 6.7 mm; EuraHSQol, ODI, and ISI scores significantly improved in 93%, 77%, and 63% of the cases, respectively.

conclusionsThe THT technique proved to be a feasible, safe, and effective alternative for corrective surgery of primary midline hernias associated with diastasis recti. Short- and mid-term results are encouraging but need to be confirmed by further studies with longer follow-up. The achieved midline reconstruction offers a significant improvement of patients' perceived quality of life through reduction of abdominal wall pain, bulging, low back pain, and urinary stress incontinence.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAbdominoplastyDiastasis, MuscleHumansQuality of LifeRectus AbdominisAbdominal wall repairMidline herniasRectus diastasisStapled repairTHT technique

Identifiers

PMID32964305
OpenAlexW3089007844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.