Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964295›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2021

Fractures of the acetabulum: from yesterday to tomorrow.

Matej Cimerman, Anže Kristan, Marko Jug, Matevž Tomaževič

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The pararectus approach in acetabular fracture fixation: evidence of reproducibility and learnability.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The research progress and potential applications ofThe British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matej CimermanTraumatology Department, Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. matej.cimerman@kclj.si.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-4317
Anže KristanTraumatology Department, Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marko JugTraumatology Department, Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matevž TomaževičTraumatology Department, Division of Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this article is to present history, state of the art, and future trends in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

methodsReview of recent and historical literature.

resultsAcetabular fractures are difficult to treat. The first descriptions of this injury already appeared in ancient Greek history, but intensive development started in the second half of the twentieth century after Judet and Letournel's seminal work. Their classification is still the gold standard today. It is actually a pre-operative planning system and is used to determine the most appropriate surgical approach. The therapy of choice for dislocated fractures is open reduction and internal fixation. Recent modern techniques based on high-tech computerized planning systems and 3D printing have been successfully integrated into orthopaedic trauma practice.

conclusionThere is no ideal surgical approach for acetabulum fracture treatment, so new approaches have been developed in recent decades. The best outcome series have shown good or excellent results, between 70 and 80%.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneHip FracturesSpinal FracturesAcetabulumFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTreatment OutcomeAcetabulumApproachesFractureHistoryPlanning

Identifiers

PMID32964295
PMCPMC8052228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.