ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021
["But you've got to do something yourself as well" : Coping with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS): perspectives of those affected and those treating them in Saarland].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe complexity of the symptoms of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) poses a particular challenge for both those affected and those treating persons with the condition. The present study deals with the questions of coping with FMS from the perspective of both those affected and those treating them and their assessment of needs and requirements in terms of health services.
methodsIn a qualitative study design, the individual views of 10 FMS patients and 10 healthcare providers were examined. The patients were selected by means of "purposive sampling" and questioned in guideline-based, problem-centred interviews. Evaluation was carried out by means of content analysis.
resultsBoth FMS patients and healthcare providers noted problems with availability and accessibility of health services. In addition, some patients felt that they were not taken seriously by their healthcare providers. Care providers in turn experienced reservations about the psychosomatic component on the part of patients. Self-initiative seems to be important for a positive approach to living with FMS.
conclusionSelf-help groups and regionally available networks represent important support possibilities, not least with regard to the psychosomatic component of FMS. Improved coordination of care services can be achieved by promoting interdisciplinary networking. Strengthening the self-initiative of patients and promoting the work of self-help groups can help those affected to develop individual coping strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.