Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964263›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Normative tonsillectomy outcome inventory 14 values as a decision-making tool for tonsillectomy.

Michaela Plath, Matthias Sand, Philippe A Federspil, Peter K Plinkert, Ingo Baumann, Karim Zaoui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of life after tonsillectomy in adult patients with recurrent acute tonsillitis: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does a tonsillectomy indicated according to the German S2k guideline affect short-term quality of life in adults?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michaela PlathDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias SandGESIS-Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.
Philippe A FederspilDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter K PlinkertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ingo BaumannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karim ZaouiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. karim.zaoui@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-2273

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aimed to determine normative values for the Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory 14 (TOI-14) in a healthy middle-European cohort. We also compared these generated values with TOI-14 scores from a patient population with recurrent tonsillitis (RT) and explored the factorial structure of the TOI-14.

methodsWe systematically studied the responses of healthy individuals (reference cohort) and patients with RT (clinical cohort) to the TOI-14 survey. The reference cohort contained 1000 participants, who were recruited using the Respondi panel for market and social science research. This subsample was quoted to the population distribution of the German Microcensus and selected from a non-probability panel. Tonsillitis patients were assessed before and 6 and 12 months after tonsillectomy. Data were analysed using principal component and exploratory factor analyses.

resultsThe PCA revealed three TOI-14 domains (physiological, psychological and socio-economic), which explained 73% of the total variance. The reference cohort perceived a good quality of life (QOL) with a TOI-14 total score of 11.8 (physiological: 8.0, psychological: 5.8, and socio-economic subscale score: 13.9). TOI-14 scores were higher in the patient cohort, indicating that the TOI-14 discriminates between patients with RT and healthy individuals with no RT. Age and female gender significantly influenced the total TOI-14 score, especially in the psychological (age) and socio-economic (gender) subscales.

conclusionWe have developed a set of normative values that, together with the TOI-14, can determine the disease burden indicating tonsillectomy.

Indexed as

TonsillectomyTonsillitisFemaleHealth StatusHumansQuality of LifeRecurrenceSurveys and QuestionnairesEFAGuidelinesMiddle-european cohortPCAQuality of lifeRecurrent tonsillitisTOI-14

Identifiers

PMID32964263
PMCPMC8057992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.