Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964259›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?

Louise Benoit, Meriem Koual, Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan, Vincent Balaya, Claude Nos, Rosa Montero-Macías, Anne-Sophie Bats

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise BenoitGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France. louise.am.benoit@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0871-1793
Meriem KoualGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.
Huyen-Thu Nguyen-XuanGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.
Vincent BalayaGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.
Claude NosGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.
Rosa Montero-MacíasGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie BatsGynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, APHP. Centre, European Georges-Pompidou Hospital, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Cedex 15, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEver since the recent findings showing the lack of benefit of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open surgery in early-stage cervical cancer, gynecologists have tried to explain these results. The primary objective of our study was to assess the impact of pre-operative conization on disease-free survival (DFS) in early-stage cervical cancer. The secondary objective was to analyze the peri-operative morbidity associated with a pre-operative conization.

methodsAll patients undergoing a surgical management for early-stage squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma cervical cancer (IA1, IA2, IB1 and IB2 FIGO 2018) at a French university hospital from 2004 to 2018 were retrospectively included. We examined the association between conization and DFS using a Cox regression model. We also analyzed the morbidity associated with pre-operative conization.

results48.4% (44/91) of the patients had a pre-operative conization (defined by a conization up to 90 days prior to surgery). 86.8% underwent MIS. There was a non-significant increase in the DFS with one patient presenting a recurrence in the conization group (2.3%) and six (12.8%) in the no conization group (log rank = 0.09). In univariate analysis, conization, definitive FIGO stage and pre-operative tumor size were associated with DFS (p < 0.2). Only pre-operative tumor size was significantly associated with DFS in multivariate analysis. There was a non-significant increase of adverse events in the conization group (43.2% in the conization group versus 23.4%, p = 0.06).

conclusionConization, through a reduction of tumor size, could improve DFS. Carefully selected patients could still benefit from minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

AdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellConizationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancerConizationDisease-free survivalMinimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.