Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964211›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2020

Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study.

Malick M Gibani, Christofer Toumazou, Mohammadreza Sohbati, Rashmita Sahoo, Maria Karvela, Tsz-Kin Hon, Sara De Mateo, Alison Burdett, K Y Felice Leung, Jake Barnett and 23 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Implementing in-vitro diagnostic point-of-care tests in community health care: how can we make this work?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent progress on rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 by point-of-care testing platforms.Chinese chemical letters = Zhongguo hua xue kuai bao · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 'CoviSwiftJournal of virological methods · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Malick M GibaniDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Christofer ToumazouDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Mohammadreza SohbatiDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Rashmita SahooDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Maria KarvelaDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Tsz-Kin HonDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Sara De MateoDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Alison BurdettDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
K Y Felice LeungDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Jake BarnettDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Arman OrbeladzeDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Song LuanDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Stavros PourniasDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Jiayang SunDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Barney FlowerDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Judith Bedzo-NutakorDnaNudge, Translation and Innovation Hub, Imperial College White City Campus, London, UK.
Maisarah AmranImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, UK.
Rachael QuinlanDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Keira SkolimowskaDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Carolina HerreraDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Aileen RowanDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Anjna BadhanDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Robert KlaberImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, UK.
Gary DaviesChelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David MuirImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, UK.
Paul RandellImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, UK.
Derrick CrookNuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Graham P TaylorDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Wendy BarclayDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Nabeela MughalDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Luke S P MooreDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
Katie JefferyNuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Graham S CookeDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.
London Biofoundry · GBImperial College London · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2016-07-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe our diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care real time RT-PCR CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing.

methodsBetween April and May, 2020, we obtained two nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals in three hospitals in London and Oxford (UK). Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred health-care workers with suspected COVID-19; patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19; and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19. For the CovidNudge test, nasopharyngeal swabs were inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (

findingsWe obtained 386 paired samples: 280 (73%) from self-referred health-care workers, 15 (4%) from patients in the emergency department, and 91 (23%) hospital inpatient admissions. Of the 386 paired samples, 67 tested positive on the CovidNudge point-of-care platform and 71 with standard laboratory RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity of the point-of-care test compared with laboratory-based testing was 94% (95% CI 86-98) with an overall specificity of 100% (99-100). The sensitivity of the test varied by group (self-referred healthcare workers 94% [95% CI 85-98]; patients in the emergency department 100% [48-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [29-100]). Specificity was consistent between groups (self-referred health-care workers 100% [95% CI 98-100]; patients in the emergency department 100% [69-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [96-100]). Point of care testing performance was similar during a period of high background prevalence of laboratory positive tests (25% [95% 20-31] in April, 2020) and low prevalence (3% [95% 1-9] in inpatient screening). Amplification of viral nucleocapsid (n1, n2, and n3) and envelope protein gene (e-gene) were most sensitive for detection of spiked SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

interpretationThe CovidNudge platform was a sensitive, specific, and rapid point of care test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 without laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. The device, which has been implemented in UK hospitals since May, 2020, could enable rapid decisions for clinical care and testing programmes.

fundingNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Oxford University in partnership with Public Health England, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, and DnaNudge.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansPoint-of-Care TestingRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32964211
PMCPMC7498257
OpenAlexW3084792233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.