Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964208›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2020

Advancing the pragmatic measurement of sustainment: a narrative review of measures.

Joanna C Moullin, Marisa Sklar, Amy Green, Kelsey S Dickson, Nicole A Stadnick, Kendal Reeder, Gregory A Aarons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanna C MoullinFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102 Australia.
Marisa SklarChild and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.
Amy GreenChild and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.
Kelsey S DicksonChild and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.
Nicole A StadnickChild and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.
Kendal ReederChild and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.
Gregory A AaronsChild and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8969-5002

Funding

Statewide System and Organizational Strategy for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation and Sustainment in Substance Use Disorder TreatmentR01DA049891 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AARONS, GREGORY · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
Testing the Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) Intervention in Substance Abuse Treatment ProgramsR01DA038466 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AARONS, GREGORY · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
Adapting and Implementing an Integrated Care Model for Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Psychiatric ComorbidityK23MH110602 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI STADNICK, NICOLE A · 2017 to 2020
$813k
Adapting an ASD Executive Functioning Intervention for Implementation in Children's Mental Health Services - Admin SupplementK23MH115100 · NIMH · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DICKSON, KELSEY S · 2018 to 2021
$730k
Development and Testing of an Evidence Based Intervention Sustainment MeasureR03MH117493 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AARONS, GREGORY · 2018 to 2019
$157k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038466NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049891NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH110602NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH115100NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH117493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustainment, an outcome indicating an intervention continues to be implemented over time, has been comparatively less studied than other phases of the implementation process. This may be because of methodological difficulties, funding cycles, and minimal attention to theories and measurement of sustainment. This review synthesizes the literature on sustainment measures, evaluates the qualities of each measure, and highlights the strengths and gaps in existing sustainment measures. Results of the review will inform recommendations for the development of a pragmatic, valid, and reliable measure of sustainment.

methodsA narrative review of published sustainment outcome and sustainability measures (i.e., factors that influence sustainment) was conducted, including appraising measures in the Society of Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) instrument review project (IRP) and the Dissemination and Implementation Grid-Enabled Measures database initiative (GEM-D&I). The narrative review used a snowballing strategy by searching the reference sections of literature reviews and definitions of sustainability and sustainment. Measures used frequently and judged to be comprehensive and/or validated by a team of implementation scientists were extracted for analysis.

resultsEleven measures were evaluated. Three of the included measures were found in the SIRC-IRP, three in the GEM-D&I database, (one measure was in both databases) and six were identified in our additional searches. Thirteen constructs relating to sustainment were coded from selected measures. Measures covered a range of determinants for sustainment (i.e., construct of sustainability) as well as constructs of sustainment as an outcome. Strengths of the measures included, development by expert panels knowledgeable about particular interventions, fields or contexts, and utility in specific scenarios. A number of limitations were found in the measures analyzed including inadequate assessment of psychometric characteristics, being overly intervention or context specific, being lengthy and/or complex, and focusing on outer context factors.

conclusionThere is a lack of pragmatic and psychometrically sound measures of sustainment that can be completed by implementation stakeholders within inner context settings (e.g., frontline providers, supervisors).

Indexed as

ImplementationKnowledge TranslationMaintenanceMeasurementPsychometric propertiesScaleSustainabilitySustainment

Identifiers

PMID32964208
PMCPMC7499830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.