ArticleInnovation in aging2020
Does Visual Speed of Processing Training Improve Health-Related Quality of Life in Assisted and Independent Living Communities?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06601933 (Cognitive Training and Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cognitive Training and Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment: COGIT-2 Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment.NEJM evidence · 2022Trial
- Evaluating depressive symptoms, BDNF Val66Met, and APOE-ε4 as moderators of response to computerized cognitive training in heart failure.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careTrial
- Long-Term Effects of Cognitive Training on All-Cause Mortality in US Older Adults.Journal of aging and health · 2022Article
- Feasibility of a Home-Based Task-Switching Training in Middle-Aged Caregivers.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022Article
- Brain training using cognitive apps can improve cognitive performance and processing speed in older adults.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Crossword puzzle training and neuroplasticity in mild cognitive impairment (COGIT-2): 78-week, multi-site, randomized controlled trial with cognitive, functional, imaging and biomarker outcomes.International journal of clinical trialsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesVisual speed of processing training had clinically and statistically significant beneficial effects on health-related quality of life among 2,802 healthy community-dwelling adults aged 65-94 years at 2 and 5 years post-training in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly randomized controlled trial. We examined whether that effect would be found among older adults in assisted and independent living communities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe conducted a two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial stratified by assisted versus independent settings in 31 senior living communities and enrolled 351 adults aged 55-102 years. The targeted intervention dose was 10 hr at baseline with 4-hr boosters at 5 and 11 months. The intervention group received computerized visual speed of processing training, while the attention control group solved computerized crossword puzzles. The health-related quality of life outcomes were the Short-Form 36-item Health Survey's mental and physical component
resultsVisual speed of processing, assisted living, and their interaction had no clinically or statistically significant effects on the physical component DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Given the medium-sized harmful effect of visual speed of processing training among those in the assisted living communities, caution is advised when using these two visual speed of processing training modalities in assisted living communities until further research verifies or refutes our findings and the underlying etiological pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.