Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964129›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2020

Feasibility and first reports of the MATCH-R repeated biopsy trial at Gustave Roussy.

Gonzalo Recondo, Linda Mahjoubi, Aline Maillard, Yohann Loriot, Ludovic Bigot, Francesco Facchinetti, Rastislav Bahleda, Anas Gazzah, Antoine Hollebecque, Laura Mezquita and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Understanding and Overcoming Resistance to Selective FGFR Inhibitors across FGFR2-Driven Malignancies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of molecular biology in the management of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gonzalo RecondoUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-1019
Linda MahjoubiDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Aline MaillardDepartment of biostatistics and epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Yohann LoriotUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Ludovic BigotUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Francesco FacchinettiUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Rastislav BahledaDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Anas GazzahDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Antoine HollebecqueDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Laura MezquitaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
David PlanchardUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Charles NaltetDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Pernelle LavaudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Ludovic LacroixUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Catherine RichonExperimental and Translational Pathology Platform (PETRA), Genomic Platform - Molecular Biopathology unit (BMO) and Biological Resource Center, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Aurelie Abou LovergneDepartment of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Thierry De BaereDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Lambros TselikasDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Olivier DeasXenTech, Evry, France.
Claudio NicotraDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Maud Ngo-CamusDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Rosa L FriasUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Eric SolaryDepartment of Hematology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Eric AngevinDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Alexander EggermontDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Ken A OlaussenUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Gilles VassalDepartment of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Stefan MichielsDepartment of biostatistics and epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-2968
Fabrice AndreUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-8357
Jean-Yves ScoazecExperimental and Translational Pathology Platform (PETRA), Genomic Platform - Molecular Biopathology unit (BMO) and Biological Resource Center, AMMICA, INSERM US23/CNRS UMS3655, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Christophe MassardUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Jean-Charles SoriaUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Benjamin BesseUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Luc FribouletUniversité Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Biomarqueurs prédictifs et nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie, 94800 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-4978
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRInserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unravelling the biological processes driving tumour resistance is necessary to support the development of innovative treatment strategies. We report the design and feasibility of the MATCH-R prospective trial led by Gustave Roussy with the primary objective of characterizing the molecular mechanisms of resistance to cancer treatments. The primary clinical endpoints consist of analyzing the type and frequency of molecular alterations in resistant tumours and compare these to samples prior to treatment. Patients experiencing disease progression after an initial partial response or stable disease for at least 24 weeks underwent a tumour biopsy guided by CT or ultrasound. Molecular profiling of tumours was performed using whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and panel sequencing. At data cut-off for feasibility analysis, out of 333 inclusions, tumour biopsies were obtained in 303 cases (91%). From these biopsies, 278 (83%) had sufficient quality for analysis by high-throughput next generation sequencing (NGS). All 278 samples underwent targeted NGS, 215 (70.9%) RNA sequencing and 222 (73.2%) whole exome sequencing. In total, 163 tumours were implanted in NOD scid gamma (NSG) or nude mice and 54 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were established, with a success rate of 33%. Adverse events secondary to invasive tumour sampling occurred in 24 patients (7.6%). Study recruitment is still ongoing. Systematic molecular profiling of tumours and the development of patient-derived models of acquired resistance to targeted agents and immunotherapy is feasible and can drive the selection of the next therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCancer genetics

Identifiers

PMID32964129
PMCPMC7478969
OpenAlexW3084163391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.