Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32964099›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020

The impact of cardiac troponin in elderly patients in the absence of acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review.

Seyed Mahdi Sedighi, Michel Nguyen, Abdelouahed Khalil, Tamas Fülöp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyed Mahdi SedighiGeriatric Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Canada.
Michel NguyenCardiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Canada.
Abdelouahed KhalilGeriatric Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Canada.
Tamas FülöpGeriatric Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comorbidities are common risk factors for rising cardiac troponin in non-acute coronary syndromes conditions. Furthermore, the risk for all-cause mortality appears to be correlated to the troponin levels. Consequently, measurement of cardiac troponin in hospital admission may contribute to predict the mortality risk in elderly patients. Among geriatric patients without acute coronary syndrome, with concomitant diseases, the correct interpretation of elevated cardiac troponin, particularly in emergency conditions poses a diagnostic dilemma. Although in several studies it is suggested that at the presence of comorbidity, there is an increase in cardiac troponin values, the elderly patients have not been included conclusively. In order to assess the diagnostic and prognostic role of cardiac troponin elevation in geriatric patients suffering from chronic diseases, a systematic review was performed. The study included the elderly patients free of acute coronary syndrome admitted to the hospital with concomitant disease, with a report of at least one cardiac troponin measurement. We found that elevated cardiac troponin is an independent prognostic factor, predicting all-cause morbidity and mortality burden in geriatric patients without acute coronary syndromes.

Indexed as

Cardiac troponinChronic diseasesElderly patients without acute coronary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID32964099
PMCPMC7490820
OpenAlexW3084334919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.