Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32963970›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2020

Estimation of nonlinear parameters of the type 5 Muskingum model using SOS algorithm.

Saeid Khalifeh, Kazem Esmaili, Saeed Reza Khodashenas, Vahid Khalifeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saeid KhalifehWater Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Kazem EsmailiDepartment of Water science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeed Reza KhodashenasDepartment of Water science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Vahid KhalifehCivil Engineering, Faculty of Civil, Sirjan University of Technology, Sirjan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Symbiotic Organisms Search Algorithm (SOS) is used as an algorithm based on the social behavior of Symbiotic Organisms in optimization of Non-linear 5 model parameters for flood routing. The data used in this article is 4 day observations from 30 November 2008 to 3 December 2008, which is located between the Molasani, and Ahwaz station on the Karun River. The time series data used included river inflow, storage volume, and river outflow. The results of the developed model with the Symbiotic Organisms Search Algorithm (SOS) were compared with the other Evolutionary algorithms including Genetic Algorithm (GA, and Harmony Search Algorithm (HS). The analysis showed that the best solutions achieved from the objective function by the SOS, GA, and HS algorithms were 143052.02, 143252.35, and 142952.45, respectively. The processes of these datasets determined that the SOS algorithm was premiere to GA, and HS algorithms on the optimal flood routing river problem.•In this article applied the Symbiotic Organisms Search Algorithm for Estimation of nonlinear parameters of the Muskingum hydrologic model of the Karun River located in Iran.•This method can be useful for managers of water, and wastewater companies, water resource facilities for predicting the flood process downstream of the rivers.•The present algorithm performs better than the other algorithms in the discussion of the optimization of Nonlinear 5 parameters of Muskingum model in flood routing.

Indexed as

Hydrologic modelKarun riverNon-linearThe symbiotic organisms search algorithm

Identifiers

PMID32963970
PMCPMC7490840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.