Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32963921›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy for Severe Endometriosis and Complex Pelvic Pathology.

Camran Nezhat, Kimsa Nguyen, Eliza Ackroyd, Robert A Roman, Anupama Rambhatla, Azadeh Nezhat, Atena Asiaii

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06802900 (Assessment of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy With Uterine Skeletonization for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06802900 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy With Uterine Skeletonization for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis (DIE)"

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaşakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsDeep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE), Nerve Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy, Uterine SkeletonizationArmsClinical Outcomes and Surgical Insights from Nerve-Sparing Hysterectomy with Uterine Skeletonization for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camran NezhatCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Kimsa NguyenCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Eliza AckroydCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Robert A RomanCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Anupama RambhatlaCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Azadeh NezhatCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Atena AsiaiiCenter for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Camran Nezhat Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with or without robotic assistance is known for its benefits as a definitive treatment for severe endometriosis. Undiagnosed endometriosis is common in patients with symptomatic fibroids or chronic pelvic pain. There are minimal studies that outline the safety and feasibility of nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for other complex pelvic pathology in addition to endometriosis. Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of hospital readmission, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and long-term pain relief after laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for severe endometriosis and complex benign pelvic pathology. Study design We performed a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with and without robotic-assistance with a high-volume minimally invasive endoscopic surgeon between November 2017 and December 2019. Results A total of 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were no cases of vaginal cuff dehiscence, venous thromboembolism, genitourinary system injury, gastrointestinal tract injury, vessel injury, nerve injury, sepsis, or death. Three patients required postoperative hospital admission for the management of umbilical cellulitis, acute blood loss anemia, and possible Addison's crisis. Other postoperative complications included allergic reaction to adhesives (1.8%) and urinary retention (0.9%). All patients reported significant pain relief at the time of their postoperative visits. Three patients reported return of pain symptoms within the first seven months after surgery, with one requiring an additional surgery for persistent pain. Conclusions Laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with or without robotic assistance is a safe and feasible alternative that provides long-term symptom relief in patients undergoing hysterectomy for a variety of indications.

Indexed as

complex pelvic pathologyendometriosisfibroidslaparoscopyminimally invasive surgerymodified radical hysterectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID32963921
PMCPMC7500726
OpenAlexW3070615589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.