ArticleCureus2020
Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy for Severe Endometriosis and Complex Pelvic Pathology.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06802900 (Assessment of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy With Uterine Skeletonization for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy With Uterine Skeletonization for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis (DIE)"
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic nerve‑sparing radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Advantages of Robotic Surgery for Patients of Reproductive Age with Endometrial Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for deep endometriosis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Vagino-Laparoscopic Conservative Strategy of Hysterectomy in Indicated Cases of Severe Pelvic Endometriosis Followed by 24 Months of Depot-Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Therapy- A Symptom-Solving Treatment Model to Ease Surgical Challenges.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Surgical and functional impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for parametrial deep endometriosis: a single centre experience.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with or without robotic assistance is known for its benefits as a definitive treatment for severe endometriosis. Undiagnosed endometriosis is common in patients with symptomatic fibroids or chronic pelvic pain. There are minimal studies that outline the safety and feasibility of nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for other complex pelvic pathology in addition to endometriosis. Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of hospital readmission, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and long-term pain relief after laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for severe endometriosis and complex benign pelvic pathology. Study design We performed a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with and without robotic-assistance with a high-volume minimally invasive endoscopic surgeon between November 2017 and December 2019. Results A total of 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were no cases of vaginal cuff dehiscence, venous thromboembolism, genitourinary system injury, gastrointestinal tract injury, vessel injury, nerve injury, sepsis, or death. Three patients required postoperative hospital admission for the management of umbilical cellulitis, acute blood loss anemia, and possible Addison's crisis. Other postoperative complications included allergic reaction to adhesives (1.8%) and urinary retention (0.9%). All patients reported significant pain relief at the time of their postoperative visits. Three patients reported return of pain symptoms within the first seven months after surgery, with one requiring an additional surgery for persistent pain. Conclusions Laparoscopic nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy with or without robotic assistance is a safe and feasible alternative that provides long-term symptom relief in patients undergoing hysterectomy for a variety of indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.