Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32963610›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

A prognosis-predictive nomogram of ovarian cancer with two immune-related genes:

Han Lin, Jiamin Wang, Xiaohui Wen, Qidan Wen, Shiya Huang, Zhefen Mai, Lingjing Lu, Xingyan Liang, Haixia Pan, Shuna Li and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Han LinDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Jiamin WangDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Xiaohui WenDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Qidan WenDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Shiya HuangDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Zhefen MaiDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Lingjing LuDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Xingyan LiangDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Haixia PanDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Shuna LiDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Yuhong HeDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Ruikang Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China.
Hongxia MaDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian carcinoma (OV) is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies globally, and the overall 5-year survival rate of OV was 47% in 2018 according to American data. To increase the survival rate of patients with OV, many researchers have sought to identify biomarkers that act as both prognosis-predictive markers and therapy targets. However, most of these have not been suitable for clinical application. The present study aimed at constructing a predictive prognostic nomogram of OV using the genes identified by combining The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset for OV with the immune score calculated by the Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data algorithm. Firstly, the algorithm was used to calculate the immune score of patients with OV in the TCGA-OV dataset. Secondly, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between low and high immune score tissues were identified, and Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis was performed to predict the functions of these DEGs. Thirdly, univariate, multivariate and Lasso Cox's regression analyses were carried out step by step, and six prognosis-related DEGs were identified. Then, Kaplan-Myer survival curves were generated for these genes and validated by comparing their expression levels to further narrow the range of DEGs and to calculate the risk score. Two genes were identified, cell division cycle 20B and patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 5, which were both shown to have higher expression levels in OV tissues and to be significantly associated with the prognosis of OV. Next, a nomogram was created using these two genes and age, and using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve, the effectiveness of the nomogram was validated. Finally, an external validation was conducted for this nomogram. The ROC showed that the areas under the curve (AUCs) of the 3- and 5-year overall survival predictions for the nomogram were 0.678 and 0.62, respectively. Moreover, the ROC of the external validation model showed that the AUCs of the 3- and 5-year were 0.699 and 0.643, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of the generated nomogram. In conclusion, the present study has identified two immune-related genes as biomarkers that reliably predict overall survival in OV. These biomarkers might also be potential molecular targets of immune therapy to treat patients with OV.

Indexed as

biomarkerscancer survivalCDC20Bimmune therapyPNPLA5

Identifiers

PMID32963610
PMCPMC7491088
OpenAlexW3083972852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.