ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
Stent retriever thrombectomy combined with long-term local thrombolysis for severe hemorrhagic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever devices in deep cerebral venous thrombosis: illustrative cases.Frontiers in stroke · 2025Article
- Evolution and advances in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Bibliometric Analysis of the Composition of Landmark Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Research.International journal of cerebrovascular disease and stroke · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with severe cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Stent Thrombectomy Alone or Combined With Intermediate Catheter Aspiration for Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case-Series.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare disease associated with high disability and mortality rates. A subset of patients do not respond to standard anticoagulation therapy, leading to the progression of CVST with hemorrhagic stroke, which represents a major challenge for its treatment. Severe hemorrhagic (SH)-CVST is life-threatening due to large hematoma, edema and/or cerebral hernia. Anticoagulation or thrombolytic therapy alone may lead to further aggravation of the hematoma. Stent retriever thrombectomy combined with long-term local thrombolysis (SRT-LLT) has been used in certain centers for those refractory cases or patients with new intracranial hemorrhage. However, to date, no studies on SRT-LLT treatment specifically for SH-CVST have been performed. The aim of the present retrospective study was to specifically evaluate the effectiveness of SRT-LLT in SH-CVST. Between December 2013 and November 2018, SRT-LLT was performed at our center in 8 patients with hemorrhagic CVST who did not respond to intravenous anticoagulation. The clinical characteristics, results of the radiological evaluation, details on the surgical procedure and clinical outcomes were assessed. The patients were administered systemic intravenous anticoagulation as the initial treatment following admission. SRT-LLT was performed when their condition deteriorated with a high risk of a fatal outcome within a short time period. SRT-LLT was performed in 8 patients, with successful recanalization confirmed by angiography. In 4 of the patients, complete recanalization was achieved, whereas in the remaining 4, recanalization was partial. There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients developed rebleeding after surgery, but they all gradually recovered. There were no treatment-associated fatalities. Therefore, SRT-LLT appears to be a feasible, safe and effective option for SH-CVST and it may be used as rescue therapy for carefully selected patients with SH-CVST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.