Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32963483›Full record

ReviewTurk pediatri arsivi2020

Overview of the pediatric healthcare system in Romania.

Tudor Lucian Pop, Marin Burlea, Oana Falup-Pecurariu, Cristina Borzan, Florina Gabor-Harosa, Valeria Herdea, Claudia Felicia Pop, Daniela Rajka, Maria Livia Ognean, Simona Sorana Căinap

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turk pediatri arsivi, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tudor Lucian Pop2 Pediatric Clinic, Mother and Child Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu Cluj-Napoca, Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Romanian Society of Social Pediatrics.
Marin BurleaSt. Mary Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Iasi, Romania; Romanian Society of Pediatrics.
Oana Falup-PecurariuFaculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Children Clinical Hospital, Brasov, Romania.
Cristina BorzanPublic Health and Healthcare Management Discipline, Community Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu; Romanian Society of Social Pediatrics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Florina Gabor-HarosaPublic Health and Healthcare Management Discipline, Community Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu; Romanian Society of Social Pediatrics, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Valeria HerdeaRomanian Association for Pediatric Education in Family Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Claudia Felicia PopNursing Discipline, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu; Romanian Association for Pediatric Education in Family Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniela RajkaSociety of Physicians in Children and Youth's Communities, Romania.
Maria Livia OgneanNeonatology Department, Emergency Clinical County Hospital Sibiu, Romania; Department of Dental Medicine and Nursing, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.
Simona Sorana Căinap2 Pediatric Clinic, Mother and Child Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu Cluj-Napoca, Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Romanian Society of Social Pediatrics.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until 1989, Romania was one of the countries of the communist bloc in Europe and its healthcare system was characterized by centralized planning and severe underfunding, with low performance and low quality healthcare. Since 1998, Romania replaced the Semashko model with a social health insurance system, highly centralized under the management of the Ministry of Health as the central administrative authority. After joining the European Union, quality of life increased in our country and there were efforts to improve the quality of healthcare, including pediatric and neonatal care. Still, Romania has the lowest share of health expenditure of gross domestic product among the European Union Member States and the lowest level of expenditure per inhabitant. The Romanian health system is organized on three levels of assistance: primary, secondary and tertiary assistance. This overview presents the organization and the characteristics of pediatric and neonatal healthcare in Romania at all levels, the infrastructure and the human resources, the educational system from medical school to pediatric residency, professional organizations, national health programs, and the child health status in Romania. Infant mortality, the most descriptive single indicator of the quality of a health system, decreased constantly for the last 30 years in Romania, but is still the highest in the European Union. Even though there were great improvements in the healthcare for children, more efforts should be made to assure a better quality of care for the future of our nation, both on the human resources (in great danger due to the brain-drain of medical professionals during the last 12 years), and on the infrastructure plan.

Indexed as

Childrenhealthcare systemmedical educationprimary careRomaniaschool medicine

Identifiers

PMID32963483
PMCPMC7488180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.