Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32963460›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2020

Validity of distress thermometer for screening of anxiety and depression in family caregivers of Chinese breast cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy.

Min Yang, Fei Ma, Bo Lan, Jianqiang Cai, Xiaoying Sun, Binghe Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min YangComprehensive Oncology Department, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Fei MaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Bo LanDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jianqiang CaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Xiaoying SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District, Beijing 100122, China.
Binghe XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFamily caregivers (FCs) of breast cancer patients play a vital role throughout the treatment process. Psychological distress of FCs is common and often ignored. A simple and effective instrument for screening psychological distress would help in selecting those FCs requiring special attention and intervention. Here, the validity of distress thermometer (DT) in FCs of Chinese breast cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy was assessed, and the prevalence of anxiety and depression was evaluated.

methodsWe recruited 200 FCs of hospitalized breast cancer patients in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Before the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy, the levels of anxiety and depression among FCs were assessed using DT and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In total, 191 valid cases were analyzed. HADS was used as the diagnostic standard to assess the effectiveness of DT as a screening tool for anxiety and depression as well as to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of DT at various cutoff points.

resultsThe definitive prevalence of both anxiety and depression was 8.90%. The mean level of anxiety and depression among FCs was 5.64±3.69 and 5.09±3.85, respectively, both of which were significantly higher than corresponding Chinese norms (P<0.01). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of DT for the diagnoses of FCs' anxiety and depression were 0.904 and 0.885, respectively. A cutoff value of 5 produced the best diagnostic effects of DT for anxiety and depression.

conclusionsThe levels of both anxiety and depression were higher in the FCs of Chinese breast cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy than the national norm. DT might be an effective tool to initially screen psychological distress among FCs. This process could be integrated into the palliative care of breast cancer patients and warrant further research.

Indexed as

anxietyBreast cancerdepressiondistress thermometer

Identifiers

PMID32963460
PMCPMC7491542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.