Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32963154›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Efficacy and Safety of Ramucirumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Progression after Treatment with Lenvatinib.

Kayoko Kasuya, Yusuke Kawamura, Masahiro Kobayashi, Junichi Shindoh, Yuta Kobayashi, Akira Kajiwara, Soichi Iritani, Shunichiro Fujiyama, Tetsuya Hosaka, Satoshi Saitoh and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kayoko KasuyaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yusuke KawamuraDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Masahiro KobayashiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Junichi ShindohOkinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yuta KobayashiOkinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Akira KajiwaraDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Soichi IritaniDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Shunichiro FujiyamaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Tetsuya HosakaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Satoshi SaitohDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Hitomi SezakiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Norio AkutaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Fumitaka SuzukiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yoshiyuki SuzukiDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Kenji IkedaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yasuji AraseDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yuichiro EguchiLiver Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga University, Japan.
Masaji HashimotoOkinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Hiromitsu KumadaDepartment of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Toranomon Hospital · JPSaga University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective A survival benefit was demonstrated for ramucirumab (RAM) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations ≥400 ng/mL who had previously received sorafenib (SOR). However, it is unclear whether RAM has a similar efficacy in patients with uHCC that progresses after lenvatinib (LEN) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the early anti-tumor response to RAM as a second-line treatment for advanced uHCC after LEN treatment. Methods We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of RAM at 6 weeks after initiation. The therapeutic effects were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients We evaluated 7 patients with uHCC who received RAM as a second- or third-line treatment after LEN failure. Results The disease control rate (DCR) was 28.6% (2 of 7 patients). After the initiation of RAM, a rapid disease progression resulted in 1 patient death after 19 days. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 41 days. There were no grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. At 6 weeks, there was no deterioration in the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade. In patients with an imaging response of stable disease (SD), the rate of AFP production decreased from the baseline. Conclusion RAM may have a therapeutic potential for the suppression of uHCC progression in patients previously treated with LEN, as well as for maintaining the liver function during treatment. Evaluating the AFP trends may therefore be useful for predicting RAM effectiveness.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesRamucirumabRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedlenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesRamucirumabhepatocellular carcinomahigh malignant potentiallenvatinibliver functionramucirumab

Identifiers

PMID32963154
PMCPMC7925279
OpenAlexW3087363136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.