ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
Dysmetria and Errors in Predictions: The Role of Internal Forward Model.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling framework disentangles cerebellar mechanisms in speech feedback control, revealing trade-offs reshaped by degeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cerebellar clinical syndromes: the triad and rating scales.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- Tremor pathophysiology.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026Review
- Cerebellar syndromes: clinical observations leading to the recognition of the three types.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Reward.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Review
- Local Dynamic Stability of Trunk During Gait is Responsive to Rehabilitation in Subjects with Primary Degenerative Cerebellar Ataxia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
- Investigation of Neuromodulatory Effect of Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Consensus Paper: Ataxic Gait.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Article
- Advances in the Pathogenesis of Auto-antibody-Induced Cerebellar Synaptopathies.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Review
- Neurophysiology of cerebellar ataxias and gait disorders.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023Review
- The Potential Role of Dopamine in Mediating Motor Function and Interpersonal Synchrony.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Cerebellar long-term depression and auto-immune target of auto-antibodies: the concept of LTDpathies.Molecular biomedicine · 2021Review
- The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Roles, molecular mechanisms, and signaling pathways of TMEMs in neurological diseases.American journal of translational research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The terminology of cerebellar dysmetria embraces a ubiquitous symptom in motor deficits, oculomotor symptoms, and cognitive/emotional symptoms occurring in cerebellar ataxias. Patients with episodic ataxia exhibit recurrent episodes of ataxia, including motor dysmetria. Despite the consensus that cerebellar dysmetria is a cardinal symptom, there is still no agreement on its pathophysiological mechanisms to date since its first clinical description by Babinski. We argue that impairment in the predictive computation for voluntary movements explains a range of characteristics accompanied by dysmetria. Within this framework, the cerebellum acquires and maintains an internal forward model, which predicts current and future states of the body by integrating an estimate of the previous state and a given efference copy of motor commands. Two of our recent studies experimentally support the internal-forward-model hypothesis of the cerebellar circuitry. First, the cerebellar outputs (firing rates of dentate nucleus cells) contain predictive information for the future cerebellar inputs (firing rates of mossy fibers). Second, a component of movement kinematics is predictive for target motions in control subjects. In cerebellar patients, the predictive component lags behind a target motion and is compensated with a feedback component. Furthermore, a clinical analysis has examined kinematic and electromyography (EMG) features using a task of elbow flexion goal-directed movements, which mimics the finger-to-nose test. Consistent with the hypothesis of the internal forward model, the predictive activations in the triceps muscles are impaired, and the impaired predictive activations result in hypermetria (overshoot). Dysmetria stems from deficits in the predictive computation of the internal forward model in the cerebellum. Errors in this fundamental mechanism result in undershoot (hypometria) and overshoot during voluntary motor actions. The predictive computation of the forward model affords error-based motor learning, coordination of multiple degrees of freedom, and adequate timing of muscle activities. Both the timing and synergy theory fit with the internal forward model, microzones being the elemental computational unit, and the anatomical organization of converging inputs to the Purkinje neurons providing them the unique property of a perceptron in the brain. We propose that motor dysmetria observed in attacks of ataxia occurs as a result of impaired predictive computation of the internal forward model in the cerebellum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.