ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Method for Detecting the Randomness of Barkhausen Noise in a Material Fatigue Test Using Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnetic Barkhausen Noise Sensor: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Non-Destructive Testing and Material Characterization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The magnetic Barkhausen noise (MBN) signal provides interesting clues about the evolution of microstructure of the magnetic material (internal stresses, level of degradation, etc.). This makes it widely used in non-destructive evaluation of ferromagnetic materials. Although researchers have made great effort to explore the intrinsic random characteristics and stable features of MBN signals, they have failed to provide a deterministic definition of the stochastic quality of the MBN signals. Because many features are not reproducible, there is no quantitative description for the stochastic nature of MBN, and no uniform standards to evaluate performance of features. We aim to make further study on the stochastic characteristics of MBN signal and transform it into the quantification of signal uncertainty and sensitivity, to solve the above problems for fatigue state prediction. In the case of parameter uncertainty in the prediction model, a prior approximation method was proposed. Thus, there are two distinct sources of uncertainty: feature(observation) uncertainty and model uncertainty were discussed. We define feature uncertainty from the perspective of a probability distribution using a confidence interval sensitivity analysis, and uniformly quantize and re-parameterize the feature matrix from the feature probability distribution space. We also incorporate informed priors into the estimation process by optimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between prior and posterior distribution, approximating the prior to the posterior. Thus, in an insufficient data situation, informed priors can improve prediction accuracy. Experiments prove that our proposed confidence interval sensitivity analysis to capture feature uncertainty has the potential to determine the instability in MBN signals quantitatively and reduce the dispersion of features, so that all features can produce positive additive effects. The false prediction rate can be reduced to almost 0. The proposed priors can not only measure model parameter uncertainties but also show superior performance similar to that of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). The results also show that improvements in parameter uncertainties cannot be directly propagated to improve prediction uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.