Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32962191›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Usability Study of Physiological Measurement in School Using Wearable Sensors.

Nattapong Thammasan, Ivo V Stuldreher, Elisabeth Schreuders, Matteo Giletta, Anne-Marie Brouwer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nattapong ThammasanHuman Media Interaction, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0487-2482
Ivo V StuldreherHuman Media Interaction, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-2162
Elisabeth SchreudersDepartment Developmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8685-352X
Matteo GilettaDepartment Developmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0574-5434
Anne-Marie BrouwerPerceptual and Cognitive Systems, The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 3769 DE Soesterberg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-4291
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLTilburg University · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWA Startimpuls 400.17.602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring psychophysiological signals of adolescents using unobtrusive wearable sensors may contribute to understanding the development of emotional disorders. This study investigated the feasibility of measuring high quality physiological data and examined the validity of signal processing in a school setting. Among 86 adolescents, a total of more than 410 h of electrodermal activity (EDA) data were recorded using a wrist-worn sensor with gelled electrodes and over 370 h of heart rate data were recorded using a chest-strap sensor. The results support the feasibility of monitoring physiological signals at school. We describe specific challenges and provide recommendations for signal analysis, including dealing with invalid signals due to loose sensors, and quantization noise that can be caused by limitations in analog-to-digital conversion in wearable devices and be mistaken as physiological responses. Importantly, our results show that using toolboxes for automatic signal preprocessing, decomposition, and artifact detection with default parameters while neglecting differences between devices and measurement contexts yield misleading results. Time courses of students' physiological signals throughout the course of a class were found to be clearer after applying our proposed preprocessing steps.

Indexed as

Heart RateMonitoring, AmbulatorySchoolsWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWristambulatory monitoringEDAheart rateperipheral physiologywearables

Identifiers

PMID32962191
PMCPMC7570846
OpenAlexW3087422162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.